.
Feedback

Where There's Fire, There's (Usually) A Code Violation

Port Chester's politicians call it "code enforcement by fire," and many are worried about the safety of firefighters.

As Port Chester housing inspectors work their way through hundreds of parcels, some trustees have taken to repeating a grim punchline about the village's current predicament: There are scheduled, methodical inspections, and then there's "code enforcement by fire."

The latter has become particularly alarming over the past year, with several major fires attributed to things like poor electrical wiring, precariously-placed space heaters, makeshift modifications and amateur repair work. In some cases, the buildings were scheduled for inspection. In others, landlords had ignored notices from inspectors or found ways to stall their efforts.

Inspectors were working on a preliminary report on the Olivia Street house that was the site of Thursday night's fire. It was likely sparked by contractors using open flames to repair old pipes in the home's basement, according to fire Chief Kevin McFadden.

Here are the details from several recent fires involving dangerous housing conditions:

 

June 6, 2011: 142 Oak St.

An Oak Street home caught fire, leaving 20 people homeless. The subsequent the home "had makeshift, exposed electrical wiring, fuel-burning equipment that wasn't vented and 'non-habitable space' used as sleeping quarters."

More fallout from the investigation: The home had previously passed a fire safety inspection in April of 2010, a month before former building inspector Frank Ruccolo was suspended amid a criminal investigation into the building department. Documents show a housing inspector expressed reservations about the property, but Ruccolo vouched for the landlord and the house passed inspection.

(Ruccolo, who earlier found himself in trouble for telling the Westmore News that some Port Chester residents were from "Third World countries where they live in mud and paper shacks," retired a few months later and collects a pension.)

The revelation about the passed 2010 inspection prompted new reviews of old records, and staff unearthed similar cases where homes passed inspection despite serious violations.

The findings prompted Assistant Village Manager Christopher Steers to weigh in, sounding exasperated: "Everything I've been doing since I've been here is to clean up these messes and to help fix these problems. They're significant. More significant than I imagined."

 

July 7, 2011: 44-48 N. Main St

Faulty electrical wiring sparked a blaze that left 16 people homeless. Inspectors found "dozens upon dozens of fire safety and building code violations including multiple electrical hazards and possible illegal units."

The fire also impacted local business owners, who were forced to close for several weeks as the landlord straightened out records with village hall and called in contractors to perform repairs.

The building was closed off to the public and tenants were supposed to be out, but a month later a police bike officer saw a three-year-old girl hanging out of a third-floor window. Alarmed, authorities took a closer look and found owner Harry Hedvat had started repair work without getting permits, while tenants were still using the building.

Inspectors say it all could have been prevented: Hedvat ignored at least two fire safety notices dating back to 2010, according to village hall.

 

Sept 7, 2010: 17 Willow St.

Ten people were left homeless when a building caught fire on tiny Willow Street. Attributed to faulty electrical wiring, the fire prompted an investigation which revealed overcrowding and illegal modifications, such as a front porch that had been enclosed and converted into a living space.

The investigation the home was co-owned by William Oxer, a former fire chief in the village. After originally pleading not guilty to charges, Oxer paid $4,000 in fines, while co-owner William Horton paid $5,000. Oxer was also on the village payroll as a DPW employee. Three months after the fire, he was suspended in a separate investigation into mass theft from Port Chester's parking meters.

 

Jan. 8, 2011: 206 Irving Ave.

In a first-floor auto parts store, a fire was sparked when several pieces of wood were left too close to a boiler, spreading flames to several upstairs apartments. Authorities said 25 people, including a family of 13, were left homeless.

The building was on an inspection list, but the visit was held up when the landlord failed to pay the entire inspection fee, according to village hall. Days after the fire, the landlord was still MIA as most of his tenants were looking for new homes and living in a Red Cross shelter.

 

Aug. 24, 2011: 67 Grace Church St.

In a scenario similar to Thursday's fire, a contractor used an open-flame torch to seal the home's foundation in an effort to prevent flooding in an illegal basement apartment. The Grace Church Street home caught fire when the contractor got too close to wood paneling, sparking flames that quickly spread to the rest of the structure.

Four families were squeezed into a two-family home, which was illegally modified with an apartment in the attic as well as the aforementioned basement dwelling. Less than a week after the fire, owner Anna Maria Blass tried to start repair work without permits.

Steers said that's typical behavior of Port Chester landlords, who operated for decades with a complicit building department. When they're told "no," the landlords "look for a different answer and they look for a work-around."

CORRECTION: Village inspectors visit three-family homes and commercial buildings, but don't conduct regular inspections of homes zoned for two families or less.

 

Follow Port Chester Patch!

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PortChesterPatch

Twitter: http://twitter.com/PChesterPatch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Linda Turturino November 5, 2011 at 03:37 pm
JUST A LONG LIST of what is wrong with this Village and the years of corruption and the impact on the community. It amazes me that Village employees caught with their hand in the cookie jar retire and collect a fat check and the residents are the ones that suffer.
Bart Didden November 7, 2011 at 12:50 am
Nik,
You wrote, as "housing inspectors work their way through more than 5,500 parcels". Well this is not the truth. The Village is only inspecting commercial and multi-family of three or four units and above. The latest fire was in a structure that was listed as a two family (per your article) by the Town Of Rye, this house would never have been inspected under the current process created by the last Board of Trustees and Mayor Pilla. My proposal to inspect all structures at the time of their sale or re-finance to obtain a new Certificate of Occupancy will inspect every single property faster than under the current system. We had a chance to pass this proposal this past September, but mayor Pilla strenuously opposed this proposed new Law. Now we will have the chance to approach this issue again on Monday November 7th and we will see if Mayor Pilla is really concerned about the safety of the people or would rather do the heavy lifting for some unknown property owners to permit them to continue to overcrowd their buildings and collect those rents. But its not just the innocent tenants in those buildings, but what about our police and firemen that go running into those burning buildings to save the life of a stranger? It's time of action and a new Law!
Nik Bonopartis November 7, 2011 at 04:53 pm
You're right, I've made a correction and cleared up some of the language in that first sentence so it more accurately reflects the inspection situation. Thanks for pointing that out.
Can you tell our readers if this will make it onto tonight's agenda, or should they expect an informal discussion during public comments?
Bart Didden November 7, 2011 at 05:28 pm
Thank Nik,
The discussion item is number 1 on the agenda, so it will be more formal than during public comments. http://www.portchesterny.com/pages/PortchesterNY_BTrustAg/I017CF9C3.0/11-07-11%20Agenda.pdf
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:20 pm
Ginger, Moe and Frankie. I am privilaged to honor you and Gabby with this funraiser. I would alsoRead More like to thank my family who drive 370 miles to help me and show their love for you. So many volunteers that help. Thank you Tina, Ray and Melissa for holding down the tshirt and bookbag table. Thank you to mom and dad for holding down the refreshment table and to Julie, Carley and Jason for working the raffle table. Also to Gabby for the wonderful tattoos and for Missy for teaching our children about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. I would also like to thank Al for bringing the firetruck and all the enjoyment it brought the little ones. Now to all that came and donated, I thank you. Without you all there would be no "WALK". Love you all, Peace and Love, Laurie.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:23 pm
One more person, my husband Rusty, you are my glue that holds me together. Thank you for putting upRead More with me through all my craziness. Love you.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:28 pm
Sorry Pete from Memorable Moments. You know how much you are appreciated for the wonderful picturesRead More that you took the day of the "walk" words cannot describe how I appreciate you donating your time. Thank you.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:04 am
Cathy, Westmed should refer to you as "Valued Customer". No person can serve two masters.Read More Every Doctor must ask themself, "Am I serving my patients or am I serving the insurance companies? Because those two are in direct financial conflict with each other. Seven minute maximum "face time" sort of answers that question, doesn't it? Today, medicine is a business...once you accept that fact you will begin to have the proper mind set to better navigate the system as a customer, not as a patient. There are exceptions.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:06 am
Craig, I may be wrong but I doubt the average doctor at Westmed is making that much money. Do youRead More have a reference for that estimate or just wishful thinking?
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:13 am
Cathy..I agree wholeheartedly. Charging for parking is the epitome of arrogance. As the insuranceRead More companies squeeze Westmed they are trying to pass their overhead onto us, when what they should be doing is dropping the underpaying plans and letting the world know which insurance companies they can no longer accept due to the insurance company's corporate greed. Maybe then the reimbursement will improve. I hope they choke on it.
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 05:31 pm
The new picture is decent ... only about 15 percent Byram.
Silvio V. Buccieri June 14, 2013 at 06:29 pm
IF you like roof tops, then this is picture you should keep posted.
FJT June 17, 2013 at 08:43 am
The photo I was referring to was the one that showed the Byram River not the one that's up thereRead More now. The village's own website has some nice photos of Port Chester. Maybe the Patch could ask to borrow one of those, or take their own photo using the same vantage point.
Craig Noor June 13, 2013 at 05:33 pm
ps oh yeah, it's stand by, not standby
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 07:40 am
Not surprisingly, the Greenwich patch photo is of a dumpster and the rye patch photo is ofRead More people's,owing crack. Or not pathetic!
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:32 am
Keep at it, Katie. It's a small potatoes thing. You'll get it straight, I'm sure. Thanks for theRead More energy.
Sandra Casey June 11, 2013 at 12:37 pm
This photo is still not appropriate. Sorry, but it is more of Byram than of Port Chester. PleaseRead More choose a photo in Port Chester.
Craig Noor June 11, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Yep the left half is Byram ... As I mentioned, if you stood in Byram you could take a picture thatRead More was all Port Chester ...
Bea Conetta June 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
This picture is truly ridiculous, because it is not Port Chester. It is a photo of Byram and aRead More parking lot. As for Patch's new format, I dislike it intensely. Go back to the old format that was more interesting and not so dull. It was good to see the comments of residents and be able to give your own opinion. It wasn't broken, so why change it? I am still waiting to get some help on how to get to my past comments. Can anyone help me with that problem that arose with the new format?
niecey June 10, 2013 at 08:02 am
I agree. It is awful. Go back to old design. I hardly go to the website anymore
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
Please! The "OLD "PATCH WAS SO MUCH EASIER TO NAVIGATE!!!!! I USED TO READ IT EVERYDAY! !!Read More NOW I JUST HATE To OPEN it:(
Aidan June 11, 2013 at 03:54 pm
I visit a lot less nowadays.
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:33 am
This reminds me what " COCA-COLA" DID DECADES AGO! . THEY CAME OUT WITH A DIFFERENT"Read More COKE" NEW! IMPROVED! ETC.ETC. FORMULA. PEOPLE HATED IT THE FIRST DAY IT WENT TO THE SHELVES! LATER ON THEY WENT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL !!! ..... IF IT AINT BROKEN!....
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:53 am
Yeah. It's lousy. Admit it and fix it.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Hi Silvio, Thanks for offering. We have a photo to be used. Just waiting for it to be changed by ourRead More tech team. Thank you.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:18 pm
HI everyone, I do not have the ability to change it myself right now. Patch is aware of the repeatedRead More requests for it to be changed. A new photograph will be put in place as soon as possible. Again, sorry for the delay and for the initial mistake that led to this photo being used. The photo that is supposed to be there is the one used on our facebook page right now.
Lisa Gentes-Hunt (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Feel free to send feedback about the site directly to AOL. Here is the link. Thanks!Read More http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fportchester.patch.com%2Fgroups%2Fopinion%2Fp%2Fplease-go-back-to-the-old-website-design
Craig Noor June 8, 2013 at 07:45 am
I sent my comment on the new pic to that email too and suggest others do too so it can be replacedRead More with a good picture
Linda Turturino June 6, 2013 at 02:08 pm
we as a community need to rally and support the efforts to right all the long past due wrongs thisRead More is a terrible situation and I for one will not rest until it is fixed and I will not take responsibility for wrongs made before my Grand Birth
FJT June 17, 2013 at 09:09 am
Sadly, comments that were posted here by Craig Noor and FJT have been removed -- along with anotherRead More commenter's invitation to share more about the issue at hand. Perhaps our comments were too negative in the eyes of certain people with more power than the average Port Chester property owner.
epp June 19, 2013 at 12:57 am
My neighborhood is riddled with irresponsible renters thanks to the money hungry dirt bag landlords.Read More More burden on the schools and village services and we pay for it every year. My property value went down another $17,000 this past year while taxes keep rising. Eighteen years here and the last seven years have not been very promising.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 10:36 am
I am so sorry about this. We will have it changed as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:26 am
I believe the Port Chester High School is the most beautiful High School in Westchester and all ofRead More the surrounding states. Its architecture is incomparable. It should be representative of the village and its residents. Also you might consider the Veterans Monument on Westchester Ave or Lyons Park with the flowers in bloom. All historical and representative of the beauty of the village. Any one of these sites would make a beautiflul
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:28 am
Patch Picture & represent the village in a magnificent manner.
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:16 pm
And while I'm on the subject of ugly this redesign is still hideous. Nice inscrutable icon next toRead More my post - it adds nothing, but meanwhile you have removed the preview of people's comments that used to come up when you clicked on their name. And this light gray type is awful. And it doesn't make the ads more visible if that is what you were thinking
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:17 pm
Wow, hit a paragraph return and it posts your comment prematurely. Are two-paragraph comments tooRead More much sophistication for your audience, advertisers, or editors?
Anna June 4, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I personally like this image of Main Street...although I would agree it is a sloppy photograph andRead More is not framed well. Why pretend that Port Chester is something that it isn't? It's not Rye. And I don't know why you'd rather have an image of generic sailboats as a backdrop.