.
Feedback

Westchester Prosecutors and Police Cheer Cuomo's Push to Expand DNA Databank

Local law enforcement leaders say an expanded DNA databank would help bring more criminals to justice and even prevent some crimes. Civil libertarians say more safeguards are needed to ensure the integrity of DNA evidence.

False advertising. Possession of graffiti instruments. Fortune-telling. Issuing a bad check.

On the surface, those misdemeanors have little in common. But if Gov. Andrew Cuomo gets state lawmakers to go along with his plan to expand the state DNA database, people convicted of those crimes will be required to submit DNA to authorities.


While most of the reaction to Gov. Andrew Cuomo's State of the State speech focused on casinos and ambitious economic revitalization plans, law enforcement officials cheered the governor's DNA proposal, while civil liberties groups urged caution.

Under current law, offenders must submit DNA if they're convicted of a felony or one of 36 specific misdemeanors, a list that includes crimes like petty larceny. Earlier this year, the state senate passed a bill that would require DNA samples from all misdemeanor convictions. That bill was never reconciled with an Assembly version that included more safeguards and granted defense attorneys similar access to databank records.

Like other law enforcement leaders, Westchester County District Attorney Janet Difiore applauded the governor's push to expand the database.

"Collecting DNA from all convicted criminal defendants who are found guilty of felonies and Penal Law misdemeanors will go far in helping our state's law enforcement prevent future crimes and resolve pending cases," the district attorney said in a statement.

Collecting DNA is as simple as swabbing saliva from a convict's mouth, a process that's "easier to take, and quicker, than fingerprints," said Capt. John Telesca of the Port Chester Police Department. Authorities would use DNA samples the same way they use fingerprints, Telesca said -- if a suspect's DNA is already in the databank from an earlier conviction, law enforcement can quickly make a match from physical evidence left at a crime scene.

That's a fact frequently underlined by advocates: The existing database has aided more than 13,000 investigations, according to the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services.

"It's a test of truth and it can only help the innocent and harm the guilty," Telesca said, "and after all, isn't that what we're supposed to be doing?"

If the DNA databank is expanded, lawmakers should make every effort to include safeguards against things like contamination and fraud, said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union.

"We’re encouraged by the governor’s recognition of the need for safeguards in the state’s DNA database," Lieberman said in a statement issued after Cuomo's speech. "Sadly, New York isn’t CSI and in the real world DNA is not infallible. The possibility for error, fraud and abuse exists at every step from the moment that DNA is collected. We need rigorous quality assurance protocols to ensure the integrity of the state’s DNA databank."

Follow Port Chester Patch!

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PortChesterPatch

Twitter: http://twitter.com/PChesterPatch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Here's all the information anyone would need to choose the most prepared, competent andRead More knowledgeable candidate. Watch the debate for yourself: http://vimeo.com/65783040
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 03:59 pm
Aidan ... your words are eloquent and true.
JJ May 9, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Wow, that's a lot of information. Thanks for sharing it.
Aidan May 20, 2013 at 05:54 pm
Of all the great sites in the village, Patch chooses this? Either a purposeful error or just a caseRead More of laziness. Change it.
HomeGrown10573 May 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Linda T., I would guess Mrs. Brakewood lives in Port Chester if she is running for the Port ChesterRead More Board of Ed. Even if the schools had to impose an austerity budget, your taxes would still go up. The state has more control in these matters than you think.
Aidan May 15, 2013 at 07:09 pm
Linda, the per pupil expenditure in PC schools is the lowest in Westchester and Rockland countiesRead More ... by about $2,000 per student. The issue is two fold. First, our property values are not as strong as our neighbors, so our homes have a higher levy in order to fund the schools. Second, and more important, is that the reliance on property taxes slams moderate income communities like PC. We need for the state to move to an income tax to fund schools. Scream at your legislators ... not the BoE.
Linda Turturino May 15, 2013 at 11:25 am
I am concerned there is not enough attention to detail in the BOE budget overall and Mrs. BrakewoodRead More comment about keeping taxes affordable ... where does she live ? they are out of control and in my opinion the money we pay for taxes we should have the best looking schools anywhere ... just my opinion