.
Feedback

One Month After a Tragedy, New York Tightens Gun Laws

Gov. Cuomo signs package into law; New York is first state to usher in change since the Newtown shooting.

New York State has adopted tighter gun regulations that officials hope will act as a ballast in preventing future gun violence.

The State Assembly voted 104-43 Tuesday afternoon to pass the NY SAFE Act, just one month and one day after the tragic elementary school massacre in Newtown, CT.

The laws strengthen the ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines; Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed the bill into law shortly after its passage in the Assembly.

Many of the cardinal changes included in the SAFE Act were touted by Cuomo in his recent State of the State address.

On Monday, the bill passed through the State Senate with resounding success, moving on to the house via a 43-to-18 vote.

Housed in the bill is an outright ban of semi-automatic weapons with detachable magazines that have any features "commonly associated with military weapons."

Also nestled in the package are a passel of other laws, which make bringing a gun onto school grounds a felony, and allow some gun owners to keep their licenses private—a decision for which The Journal News' gun map was likely the catalyst.

(Readers can see a more comprehensive look at the legislation here and here.)

In a statement about his signature for the legislation, Cuomo was upbeat about the measure.

"The new law will limit gun violence through common sense, reasonable reforms that include addressing the risks posed by mentally ill people who have access to guns and banning high capacity magazines and lethal assault weapons," said Cuomo in the press release. "This legislation is not about hunters, sportsmen, or legal owners who use their guns appropriately. It is about reducing gun violence and making New York a safer place to live. I thank leadership of both the Assembly and Senate for their action on this important legislation."

New York's Attorney General Eric Schneiderman has hailed the tightening of gun laws as a step forward.

"With the passage of this legislation, our state has taken decisive action to protect New Yorkers from gun violence," he said Tuesday. "I look forward to continuing to work together with my colleagues in government and law enforcement as we seek to expand our efforts to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people."

Others, however, are chagrined by the legislation.

"These gun control schemes have failed in the past and will have no impact on public safety and crime," the National Rifle Association penned in a press release Tuesday. "Sadly, the New York Legislature gave no consideration to that reality."

Allison January 16, 2013 at 10:20 pm
well said, spot on Momma!
It's the point I was trying to raise earlier that many did not get or want to. I don't agree that what our "fearless" leaders have dictated will even make a dent in this issue. Unfortunately more expensive (courtesy of taxpayers) layers of bureaucracy on all fronts will not yield compliance for that end game- a safe environment.
Francis T McVetty January 17, 2013 at 09:01 pm
Don't worry Joel, people are leaving the state of New York already because of the high taxes. These new laws will only enhance that flow.
Francis T McVetty January 17, 2013 at 09:08 pm
Pauline, WHAT? [Not ONCE have any pro gun groups come out and done anything pro-active for children's safety.] Have you ever heard of the 'Eddie Eagle Program" run and sponsored by the NRA. Your ignorance is showing again.
Francis T McVetty January 17, 2013 at 09:15 pm
@ pauline, Again the MIS-INFORMED speak out [owning automatic weapons].The second amendment guarantees YOUR right to posses a firearm, it did NOT say semi-automatic or blunderbust. Just like the firts amendment didn't say texting, telephone, or television ETC.
By the way, how did "zombies " get into the discussion?
John Wilson January 17, 2013 at 10:01 pm
If you have 10 round magazines for your M1 Carbine they are not original. They were issued with 15 round magazines and with the advent of the M2 around late 1944 30 round magazines began production. At no time did the military issue 10 rounds; however, whatever the age of your 10 round magazines, they would be legal if you only load 7 rounds into them. If you load 8 rounds you could be charged with a misdemeanor.
Teleman January 17, 2013 at 10:29 pm
The laws that were drafted in just 2 days through non-transparent back room deals in the capital, went through no 3 day public comment period, and were voted on in the middle of the night without all of the senators getting enough time to read them should shame ALL citizens of NY. In your emotional, knee jerk irrational race to "do something" you're throwing your rights down the drain. Something to really be proud of.
Teleman January 17, 2013 at 10:32 pm
Pauline you are so representative of the anti-gun crowd here. George Washington did not draft the 2nd amendment- James Madison did- so now that we see how much the constitution means to you after your lecture and lack of knowledge of it, it's best for you to just sit this one out.
Walden Macnair January 17, 2013 at 10:44 pm
Francis,
How about we agree on one point. All gun sales should require a background check to assure that the person buying the gun isn't a felon or dangerously insane? Can we agree on that?
Teleman January 17, 2013 at 11:11 pm
And as Francis said automatic weapons have been banned since the National Firearms Act of 1938- which was passed because criminals were using automatic weapons and outgunning the police. Your whole statement shows how ignorant of facts and narrow minded you thinking is. Law abiding citizens are not holding rallies for the guns, they're holding them for their rights. As for pro-gun groups and safety, every gun group i've been a member of places safety for adults and children as the number 1 priority. The children and adults are being murdered by other children and adults. It's time to stop personifying objects and objectifying people.
pauline schneider January 18, 2013 at 01:37 am
@Teleman, it was Washington that sat his cabinet down with the directive to draft the Bill of rights as he believed it should be. Perhaps Madison actually wrote/drafted the piece, but I made the mistake of assuming everyone knew that it was George we need to thank for our right to speak freely and go hunting. Apparently you were not aware of this. Would you like to sit this out as well?
pauline schneider January 18, 2013 at 01:46 am
Its pretty obvious Americans have abused this "right".
Anyone whining about having this "right" tempered and regulated needs to visit Newtown and read the paper. Children and family members are being shot every. What did the NRA Eddie Eagle program do for ghem? Hm? Nada.
pauline schneider January 18, 2013 at 02:03 am
As for anyone leaving NY. To the contrary. Always been the place to move to. Better jobs, better schools, more opportunity and now getting safer. http://westchester.news12.com/news/real-estate-sales-rise-in-the-hudson-valley-1.4449028?qr=1
joe January 18, 2013 at 06:46 pm
Pauline are you serious. This is why I love math. Math is a science. Pauline stop living in your left wing looney world. These are the facts. 100,000 people leave the state each year. We have fewer congressman (electoral college) votes than we use to. Westchester has the highest taxes of all 3500 counties in America. New York's highest income tax rate is 9.97% and you only have to make 60,000 to reach it. Better jobs? yeah, if you are a hedge fund mangager or school teacher. The unemployment rate is usually well above the national average----oh yeah, and would you like to talk about upstate.
Francis T McVetty January 19, 2013 at 05:54 pm
Most gun sales in New York require a background check,. How has this "new" law changed that?
Francis T McVetty January 19, 2013 at 05:56 pm
Pauline, it is because of "liberals" like you that the "Eddie Eagle" program is not being allowed in schools. The word "gun" is like the word "God" being used in school, it is NOT allowed.
Francis T McVetty January 19, 2013 at 05:58 pm
Pauline, Just what profession are you in, or are you independently wealthy?
Son of Liberty January 19, 2013 at 07:40 pm
This is for the Pro-Freedom aka pro-gun people. You cannot reason with the anti-gun folks. For every fact they have 3 misconceptions, hyperbole, and lies. It's pointless. Instead, if you haven't already, join the NRA. Their membership has increased by 250,000 members in the last month alone. Guns have already flown off the shelves and, for all the useless laws being passed, the gun industry is stronger than ever. The left only has themselves to blame. Let us unify under the NRA, vote these garbage politicians out of office and reclaim our state and our country. We will bring freedom back. We outnumber the vocal misinformed left. They consistently fail to realize just how many people live in this country, outside of the coastal urban areas, and are pro-gun. Change is coming. Get involved in ways that matter. These comment threads only serve to get us worked up. Take a stand, Join the NRA, and fight the left the way they fight us, through lobbies, politics, and law. It may be an uphill battle, but we aren't the whiny types. We are the ones who suck it up and get things done.
Veritas Justitia et Libertas
elizabeth January 20, 2013 at 12:11 am
Guns are created to kill, nothing more, nothing less. They are un-holy, and against the goodness in our nature. As a result, people who support them get disproportianately riled up, because deep inside, whether conscious or unconsious, they know they are wrong.
pauline schneider January 29, 2013 at 06:45 am
exactly.
steve smith February 1, 2013 at 12:27 pm
pauline, #1 ; i didnt say anything gender - wise. #2 : i was a crack shot w/ my 22 rifle when i was 8 yrs old. --so much for children.
Francis T McVetty February 2, 2013 at 03:42 pm
And those that turn their weapons into plow shears shall be governed by those who don't. Those who don't learn from history are destined to repeat it. If you don't a want a weapon, then YOU don't have to have one. No one is forcing you to. When someone breaks into you house, just call the police. I'm sure that the criminals will wait till the police arrive. One thing though, please don't think that I will help you. It is a Darwinian thing, only the strong survive.
James Bankhart February 2, 2013 at 04:33 pm
What these fools have done is akin to Prohibition. They will take the majority of law abiding people and create an underground market for firearms and accessories. This will actually fuel the gun running that has been the problem all along. The market will no longer just be low lifes, but average people. Prohibition did not end drinking, it funded Organized Crime.
Ross Revira February 3, 2013 at 12:47 am
Must be anti-nuke with that logic.
Abby Normal February 3, 2013 at 04:32 pm
Why is it that the pro-gun people wrap themselves in the flag of patriotism to say they must have guns in order to launch an insurrection against the government?
Francis T McVetty February 4, 2013 at 09:55 pm
Abby, again please read the second amendment again. Maybe it will a few times for you to understand it. You may also want to read the Jefferson papers to understand the thoughts of the founding fathers. No one is launching a insurrection against the government, but if there ever comes a time, the founding fathers gave us the " ammunition" to do just that. We are probably the only country in the world left that the citizens could actually stand up to a tyrannical government. When only the police or the government have weapons, you have NO freedom. The history of that is abundant.
Aidan February 4, 2013 at 10:28 pm
"wrap themselves in the flag of patriotism" ... another libtard expression.
Aidan February 4, 2013 at 10:30 pm
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
-- Thomas Jefferson
Abby Normal February 5, 2013 at 03:05 pm
Aiden. Allow me to refer you to a source: http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/strongest-reason-people-to-retain-right-to-keep-and-bear-arms-quotation
That link is the Jefferson website who say that this quote which is often attributed to Thomas Jefferson was never written in any of his writings and cannot be traced back to him in any form. You see Aiden and Francis, that is the problem with getting all your news from Sean Hannity. So Francis, when you are ready to enlist in a well organized militia, please let me know and I'll see what we can do for you. In the meantime you need to understand that the 2nd amendment has been restricted before and will be again. That's why you can't own a machine gun and in New York State you can't own a lot of other guns such as AR-15's and high capacity magazines. I know as you grow old your eyesight may be failing you but I leave you with this; In the meantime if you think that the government of the United States is Tyrannical, your are simply demented.
Dan Seidel February 5, 2013 at 05:25 pm
Hey Abby: check your sources again:
Aidan is correct: It's a Jeffersonism. it is from the Proposal for the Virginia Constitution, 1 T. Jefferson Papers, 334 (C.J. Boyd, Ed., 1950).
Ross Revira February 5, 2013 at 07:19 pm
Abby Normal (what an oxymoron) I went to the link you provided and it quotes Thomas Jefferson writing "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." in a draft of the Virginia Constitution. You have to stop getting all your information from that great intellectual Piers Morgan.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:20 pm
Ginger, Moe and Frankie. I am privilaged to honor you and Gabby with this funraiser. I would alsoRead More like to thank my family who drive 370 miles to help me and show their love for you. So many volunteers that help. Thank you Tina, Ray and Melissa for holding down the tshirt and bookbag table. Thank you to mom and dad for holding down the refreshment table and to Julie, Carley and Jason for working the raffle table. Also to Gabby for the wonderful tattoos and for Missy for teaching our children about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. I would also like to thank Al for bringing the firetruck and all the enjoyment it brought the little ones. Now to all that came and donated, I thank you. Without you all there would be no "WALK". Love you all, Peace and Love, Laurie.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:23 pm
One more person, my husband Rusty, you are my glue that holds me together. Thank you for putting upRead More with me through all my craziness. Love you.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:28 pm
Sorry Pete from Memorable Moments. You know how much you are appreciated for the wonderful picturesRead More that you took the day of the "walk" words cannot describe how I appreciate you donating your time. Thank you.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:04 am
Cathy, Westmed should refer to you as "Valued Customer". No person can serve two masters.Read More Every Doctor must ask themself, "Am I serving my patients or am I serving the insurance companies? Because those two are in direct financial conflict with each other. Seven minute maximum "face time" sort of answers that question, doesn't it? Today, medicine is a business...once you accept that fact you will begin to have the proper mind set to better navigate the system as a customer, not as a patient. There are exceptions.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:06 am
Craig, I may be wrong but I doubt the average doctor at Westmed is making that much money. Do youRead More have a reference for that estimate or just wishful thinking?
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:13 am
Cathy..I agree wholeheartedly. Charging for parking is the epitome of arrogance. As the insuranceRead More companies squeeze Westmed they are trying to pass their overhead onto us, when what they should be doing is dropping the underpaying plans and letting the world know which insurance companies they can no longer accept due to the insurance company's corporate greed. Maybe then the reimbursement will improve. I hope they choke on it.
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 05:31 pm
The new picture is decent ... only about 15 percent Byram.
Silvio V. Buccieri June 14, 2013 at 06:29 pm
IF you like roof tops, then this is picture you should keep posted.
FJT June 17, 2013 at 08:43 am
The photo I was referring to was the one that showed the Byram River not the one that's up thereRead More now. The village's own website has some nice photos of Port Chester. Maybe the Patch could ask to borrow one of those, or take their own photo using the same vantage point.
Craig Noor June 13, 2013 at 05:33 pm
ps oh yeah, it's stand by, not standby
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 07:40 am
Not surprisingly, the Greenwich patch photo is of a dumpster and the rye patch photo is ofRead More people's,owing crack. Or not pathetic!
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:32 am
Keep at it, Katie. It's a small potatoes thing. You'll get it straight, I'm sure. Thanks for theRead More energy.
Sandra Casey June 11, 2013 at 12:37 pm
This photo is still not appropriate. Sorry, but it is more of Byram than of Port Chester. PleaseRead More choose a photo in Port Chester.
Craig Noor June 11, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Yep the left half is Byram ... As I mentioned, if you stood in Byram you could take a picture thatRead More was all Port Chester ...
Bea Conetta June 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
This picture is truly ridiculous, because it is not Port Chester. It is a photo of Byram and aRead More parking lot. As for Patch's new format, I dislike it intensely. Go back to the old format that was more interesting and not so dull. It was good to see the comments of residents and be able to give your own opinion. It wasn't broken, so why change it? I am still waiting to get some help on how to get to my past comments. Can anyone help me with that problem that arose with the new format?
niecey June 10, 2013 at 08:02 am
I agree. It is awful. Go back to old design. I hardly go to the website anymore
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
Please! The "OLD "PATCH WAS SO MUCH EASIER TO NAVIGATE!!!!! I USED TO READ IT EVERYDAY! !!Read More NOW I JUST HATE To OPEN it:(
Aidan June 11, 2013 at 03:54 pm
I visit a lot less nowadays.
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:33 am
This reminds me what " COCA-COLA" DID DECADES AGO! . THEY CAME OUT WITH A DIFFERENT"Read More COKE" NEW! IMPROVED! ETC.ETC. FORMULA. PEOPLE HATED IT THE FIRST DAY IT WENT TO THE SHELVES! LATER ON THEY WENT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL !!! ..... IF IT AINT BROKEN!....
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:53 am
Yeah. It's lousy. Admit it and fix it.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Hi Silvio, Thanks for offering. We have a photo to be used. Just waiting for it to be changed by ourRead More tech team. Thank you.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:18 pm
HI everyone, I do not have the ability to change it myself right now. Patch is aware of the repeatedRead More requests for it to be changed. A new photograph will be put in place as soon as possible. Again, sorry for the delay and for the initial mistake that led to this photo being used. The photo that is supposed to be there is the one used on our facebook page right now.
Lisa Gentes-Hunt (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Feel free to send feedback about the site directly to AOL. Here is the link. Thanks!Read More http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fportchester.patch.com%2Fgroups%2Fopinion%2Fp%2Fplease-go-back-to-the-old-website-design
Craig Noor June 8, 2013 at 07:45 am
I sent my comment on the new pic to that email too and suggest others do too so it can be replacedRead More with a good picture
Linda Turturino June 6, 2013 at 02:08 pm
we as a community need to rally and support the efforts to right all the long past due wrongs thisRead More is a terrible situation and I for one will not rest until it is fixed and I will not take responsibility for wrongs made before my Grand Birth
FJT June 17, 2013 at 09:09 am
Sadly, comments that were posted here by Craig Noor and FJT have been removed -- along with anotherRead More commenter's invitation to share more about the issue at hand. Perhaps our comments were too negative in the eyes of certain people with more power than the average Port Chester property owner.
epp June 19, 2013 at 12:57 am
My neighborhood is riddled with irresponsible renters thanks to the money hungry dirt bag landlords.Read More More burden on the schools and village services and we pay for it every year. My property value went down another $17,000 this past year while taxes keep rising. Eighteen years here and the last seven years have not been very promising.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 10:36 am
I am so sorry about this. We will have it changed as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:26 am
I believe the Port Chester High School is the most beautiful High School in Westchester and all ofRead More the surrounding states. Its architecture is incomparable. It should be representative of the village and its residents. Also you might consider the Veterans Monument on Westchester Ave or Lyons Park with the flowers in bloom. All historical and representative of the beauty of the village. Any one of these sites would make a beautiflul
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:28 am
Patch Picture & represent the village in a magnificent manner.
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:16 pm
And while I'm on the subject of ugly this redesign is still hideous. Nice inscrutable icon next toRead More my post - it adds nothing, but meanwhile you have removed the preview of people's comments that used to come up when you clicked on their name. And this light gray type is awful. And it doesn't make the ads more visible if that is what you were thinking
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:17 pm
Wow, hit a paragraph return and it posts your comment prematurely. Are two-paragraph comments tooRead More much sophistication for your audience, advertisers, or editors?
Anna June 4, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I personally like this image of Main Street...although I would agree it is a sloppy photograph andRead More is not framed well. Why pretend that Port Chester is something that it isn't? It's not Rye. And I don't know why you'd rather have an image of generic sailboats as a backdrop.