.
Feedback

Rye's Carvin Eyes Senate Seat

Joseph Carvin announces his campaign to earn the Republican nomination.

Rye Town Supervisor Joseph Carvin hopes to unseat New York's junior senator this November.

To do that, he'll have to convince Republicans he's the best candidate out of three currently eyeing Kirsten Gillibrand's seat. Carvin, 57, joins conservative attorney Wendy Long and Nassau County Comptroller George Maragos in the race for the GOP nomination.


Gillibrand was appointed to the senate in 2009 after Hillary Clinton vacated her seat to join President Obama's administration as Secretary of State. Previously, she was a two-term congresswoman serving in New York's 20th congressional district.

While she was viewed as a moderate during her time as a congresswoman, Gillibrand has come under fire for changing her stance on issues such as gun control and immigration. She was also on the receiving end of negative press for her , controversial internet regulation legislation that prompted enormous backlash.

Critics have blasted Gillibrand for her association with New York's senior senator, Chuck Schumer. Gillibrand is often described as a Schumer "protege," and critics point to Schumer as one of the main influences in Gillibrand's increasingly liberal leanings.

Since Gillibrand was appointed to her senate seat, November's election is viewed as a test for her and an opportunity for Republicans.

Carvin hopes to contrast himself with Gillibrand by touting his fiscal conservatism, while remaining moderate on social issues to appeal to New York voters. In statements issued after his announcement on Wednesday, Carvin called Gillibrand a "classic politician" and accused her of lax attitudes toward the country's ailing economy.

In a statement, Carvin said he chose to run because he believes the country's "competitive position risks dramatic deterioration" if things aren't turned around.

"Time is running out," Carvin said. "The time to act is now.

Carvin is most familiar to voters in Rye and Port Chester as the town supervisor. Since taking office in 2007, he's delivered promised tax cuts, although his critics have pointed out the savings to taxpayers are negligible because Rye Town's villages -- Port Chester and Rye Brook -- deliver the majority of high-intensity services, like police and fire protection.

But Carvin has also earned praise in some circles for his willing participation in the Rye Town dissolution study. Carvin has signalled willingness to dissolve the town government, even though it means losing his elected position. Since most services are provided by the villages, the town is largely viewed as a redundant layer of local government.

Carvin intends to sink $1 million of his own money into his campaign, and hopes to raise as much as $10 million in his bid for the Republican nomination, according to the Wall Street Journal. He's also enlisted the help of top political strategists and is looking to bring other big-names on board.

The Republican primary is scheduled for June 26.

Follow Port Chester Patch!

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PortChesterPatch

Twitter: http://twitter.com/PChesterPatch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
HomeGrown10573 May 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Linda T., I would guess Mrs. Brakewood lives in Port Chester if she is running for the Port ChesterRead More Board of Ed. Even if the schools had to impose an austerity budget, your taxes would still go up. The state has more control in these matters than you think.
Aidan May 15, 2013 at 07:09 pm
Linda, the per pupil expenditure in PC schools is the lowest in Westchester and Rockland countiesRead More ... by about $2,000 per student. The issue is two fold. First, our property values are not as strong as our neighbors, so our homes have a higher levy in order to fund the schools. Second, and more important, is that the reliance on property taxes slams moderate income communities like PC. We need for the state to move to an income tax to fund schools. Scream at your legislators ... not the BoE.
Linda Turturino May 15, 2013 at 11:25 am
I am concerned there is not enough attention to detail in the BOE budget overall and Mrs. BrakewoodRead More comment about keeping taxes affordable ... where does she live ? they are out of control and in my opinion the money we pay for taxes we should have the best looking schools anywhere ... just my opinion
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Here's all the information anyone would need to choose the most prepared, competent andRead More knowledgeable candidate. Watch the debate for yourself: http://vimeo.com/65783040
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 03:59 pm
Aidan ... your words are eloquent and true.
JJ May 9, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Wow, that's a lot of information. Thanks for sharing it.
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Hey Willie....Tom Corbia is a retired PC teacher and his wife is a current employee of the schoolRead More district. Got a problem with that?
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:39 pm
Concerned View, I am sure if elected Jimmy and the other rocket scientist Tommy will put their headsRead More together and solve all our financial woes. Likely they will figure out how to have an iPad for each student, join the code enforcement guys on overcrowding raids, tie Starwoods negotiating team in knots, and solve global warming. Hey, when most of the retired teachers I know are driving around in Fords, Tommy is cruising around town in a brand new Mercedes Benz, so as a self proclaimed fiscal conservative he must be great at crunching those numbers and stretching a buck!
Concerned View May 9, 2013 at 10:42 am
Suspecting that in the next few years, the school board will be forced to resolve the gap betweenRead More expenses and revenues.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:08 am
Concerned View, both the village and the schools have rising expenditures. Costs go up every year -Read More is this a surprise!? The village has the ability to cover up its rise in expenditures by jacking up fees for things like parking, permits, and the like. Didn't I just read an article about new parking meter fees and hours village wide? The school district have no choice but to present and explain its rise in expenditures. The taxpayer has to be smart enough to understand that the rise is unavoidable and reasonable given economic circumstances.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:00 am
Concerned View, you need to sit down with Mr. Carriere and get on the same page on this issue. YouRead More seem to want the district to buoy the fund balance (or go over a cliff!) while Mr. Carriere wants the district to drain it and give it back to the taxpayers. You are confusing readers by being on such opposite pages on this big issue. It certainly makes me glad that neither of you are in charge of the school budget.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 03:56 am
MM11, one reasonable explanation might be that there are two teachers in many classrooms. InRead More inclusion classes (mainstreamed special ed classes) there could easily be two or MORE teachers in the classroom, bringing down the student-teacher ratio while the actual number of students in the class remains the same.
Bea Conetta April 26, 2013 at 09:47 pm
In my opinion, Carolee Brakewood is an absolute "must" for the BOT. She is sincere andRead More dedicated to our village and to the education of our children. She deserves a 2nd term.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 03:08 pm
John, thank you for recognizing my power! : )
John March 29, 2013 at 01:15 am
Get over yourself, Craig Noor. You're one of the people responsible for the mess this country isRead More in.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 01:01 am
Mr. Vecchione, it is President Obama, not "the resident", whether or not you like him heRead More was elected legitimately as president twice, despite all the efforts of Republicans to block that with positively un-American restrictions on the ability of people (primarily people of color, students, the military, and seniors) to vote. Please respect the office of the presidency. Thank you.