Legislative Committee Approves Proposed Budget Without Layoffs

Budget & Finance committee votes in favor of revised 2013 budget that still carries an 18 percent property tax increase but rescinds layoffs


The Rockland County Legislature’s Budget & Finance Committee approved a revised proposed budget for 2013 on Monday night. The reworked budget proposal does not eliminate the almost 70 positions identified in the county executive’s original spending plan.  Instead it reduces overtime, does away with vacant positions, which were still accounted for in the county executive’s budget and cut contingency funding in half. 

The committee’s budget proposal will go before the full legislature tonight.  The budget remains at $736 million and still carries an 18 percent increase for property tax payers.  But it restores the mosquito control program, highway department workers and deputies in the Sheriff’s Patrol and Mounted Units. It rescinds the layoffs of security guards, food service staff in the jail and laundry service employees.

Budget & Finance Chairman Ilan Schoenberger said, “All of those (services) consist of CSEA personnel who signed a contract with the county and were told there would be no layoffs for budgetary reasons.”

He said the county had to be accountable to its employees and could not tell them one thing and then eliminate their positions with plans to replace that service with an outside agency.  The revised budget included a Legislative Appropriation Reserve of $1.4 million that would be put aside in case funds are needed. A resolution would be needed before any of the money could be used.

The vote to adopt the committee’s report on the budget was six in favor and three opposed. Legislators Philip Soskin, Harriet Cornell, Schoenberger, John Murphy Frank Sparaco and Toney Earl voted in favor with Michael Grant, Alden Wolfe and Nancy Low-Hogan casting votes against.

“My concern is we are not doing anything about the large looming deficit,” she said.  “We don’t know what is going to happen in 2014.”

Schoenberger objected to Low-Hogan’s comments.

“To say we’re not doing anything about the deficit is not true, it’s not accurate,” he said. “Were moving and we’re fighting and we’re trying to reduce the county deficit.”

The committee vote on accepting the legislature’s vote was seven in favor and two opposed.  Soskin, Cornell, Wolfe, Schoenberger, Murphy, Earl and Grant supported it.  Low-Hogan and Sparaco voted against it.

Wolfe explained he supported the legislature’s budget because he felt it was better than the budget submitted by the county executive.

The legislature’s consultants determined in some areas the county executive’s budget understated revenues.  The legislators indicated they relieved heavily on the recommendations of the auditor’s report and referred to it frequently during the more than two-hour long meeting.

Committee members also voted on restoring $188,000 of funding for contract agencies that had been cut in C. Scott Vanderhoef’s budget.  They also discussed technical adjustments requested by the county executive’s office, which actually contract agencies that had been overlooked and not budgeted for any funding.  The county’s finance commission said the $276,000 could be taken from the Early Intervention and Pre-K Programs budgets of more than $7.7 million because enrollment has been lower than projected.

Wolfe was skeptical about so much excess in those programs’ budgets.

The revised budget took out the $12 million of potential revenue from the sale of Summit Park Nursing Home & Hospital included in the original budget.  Later this month or in January, legislators expect to discuss the recommendation to establish an LDC (Local Development Corporation) to handle the sale of Summit Park.

If the full legislature passes the revised budget, it goes to Vanderhoef who can approve it or veto certain line items. If he exercises line item vetoes then the budget goes back to the legislature, which can override his vetoes with a two-thirds majority.  If they reject the revised budget then the original budget proposed by Vanderhoef goes into effect in January.

The meeting tonight begins at 6 p.m. with several public hearings prior to the discussion and vote on next year's budget.

Here is what's been discussed so far during this budget process:

  • Proposed 2013 Budget Enters Final Phases
  • Cornell Cooperative Extension Director Defends Department
  • Legislators Debate Capital Projects Despite Absent Reps
  • Consultants Point to Flaws In County Budget Proposal
  • County Mosquito Program Faces Possible Cuts
  • Public Speaks Out Against Proposed Budget At Legislature Meeting
  • Rocklanders’ Reliance On Social Services Increasing
  • Sheriff Makes Case For Restoration Of Budget Cuts
  • Proposed County Budget—Public Safety Concerns (Highway Department)
  • Proposed County Highway Layoffs May Reduce Service
  • Legislature Debates Cuts In General Services
Mark Walker December 05, 2012 at 03:55 AM
"no layoffs for budgetary reasons?" So the County of Rockland guarantees employment? Since when? Why have a budget if you are guaranteeing jobs? And the Chairman of the Budget and Finance Committee is running for County Executive? We need fresh blood in Rockland County. Time to form an adhoc search committee.
Observer December 05, 2012 at 03:33 PM
from d mitchell "If all land owners had to pay taxes Rockland county would have a cash surplus I'm talking about the block". I think we all know what this is referring to and I completely agree with d. balancing the budget needs to start at fair and balanced accountability of finances -- or maybe we all need to convert (NOT happening!!)
Laborers Local 754 December 12, 2012 at 05:51 PM
Mr. or Ms. Godfrey, Progressive does not mean Liberalism. It means reforming government to work efficiently and fiscally responsible. Balancing the approach is the key. Focusing the resources of government where they are most needed and executing that focus is what progressive is all about. Party politics have become a roadblock to good efficient government.
Pat Godfrey December 13, 2012 at 01:30 AM
Local 754. It's Mr. Progressive party started by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912 platforms were the 1st federal income tax, farm subsidies, a federal securities commision (regulate banks and money), the inheritance tax. These are now law and have increased the power and money flowing into the federal government. Back then when he introduced them they were radical. Now you may have changed the party I don't know what they do now accept still grow government nationally. Maybe your different. Here is what I do know, there is no and has never been a government that is run "efficiently". The only thing that the government does real well is the military. Everything else is inefficient and the only way to make it more efficient is to cut the size of it. The bigger it gets the more wasteful it gets.
Laborers Local 754 December 13, 2012 at 01:47 AM
Mr. Godfrey, then lets take the pieces we need and make them more efficient and use them to build a floor by where private enterprise and individuals can build up from. The floor has to be strong and maintained . Pres. Roosevelt envisioned that when he corrected the wrongs in society. We must all work together and find the "American" standard . Then government can get out of the way and let the free market and individual freedom roll.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »