Politics & Government

County Legislative Redistricting Appears Mostly Minor; New Splits, Election Districts Discussed

The County Board of Legislators this week debated how to redraw district boundaries in reaction to the 2010 Census.

Members of the Westchester County Board of Legislators have begun their decennial process to redraw their district boundaries, with a proposed map unveiled at a Thursday meeting of the Committee on Legislation.

The map, presented by Dr. Andrew Beveridge, a sociology professor at Queens College, mostly calls for incremental changes to the district boundaries, something that he called "a nip and tuck approach." The changes are being done to account for changes in population data from the 2010 Census.

The criteria that Beveridge cited in drawing districts include geographical contiguity and having a similar population size.

Find out what's happening in Port Chesterwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Despite maintaining similarities with the current districts, there are some changes in municipalities. Peekskill, which has historically been in one district, would be split into two under the proposal. The district would be divided between districts 1 and 9, instead of only being under 1. Sleepy Hollow would also see a change, with part of it moving into District 3 and the remainder staying in District 8.

Legislator John Testa (R-Peekskill), expressed concern with the partitioning of his city due to it having been under one district. Testa, a former Peekskill mayor, also felt that it could be confusing for residents.

Find out what's happening in Port Chesterwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Port Chester, which is currently located in District 6 and represented by Legislator Marin Rogowsky (D-Harrison) would remain essentially the same. The new District 6 would extend slightly farther north and south.

Legislators are requesting a full list of which municipalities would be split to discuss at their next meeting.

In another matter of concern, legislators want to know what consent, if any, would be needed from towns and cities (villages are not involved in this process) for an accompanying change to election district boundaries.

Legislator John Nonna (D-Pleasantville) who chairs the committee, hopes to have something voted out for a public hearing at the committee's upcoming Monday meeting. It is hoped that a public hearing could be set for May 2. The goal, Nonna said, is to have the districts done by May, which is necessary for legislative candidates' ballot petition deadlines in June. Nonna, who represents District 3, is among those who would be notably affected if the proposed districts are adopted, as he would take on part of Sleepy Hollow.

A map of the proposed boundaries is attached to this story. To see what the current districts look like, click here for the board's website.


Get more local news delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for free Patch newsletters and alerts.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here