.
Feedback

Code: 40 Illegal Living Spaces Discovered in William St. Building After Fire

Inspectors document 466 violations and returned to the William Street building four times after a freak fire caused by spontaneous combustion on Jan. 10.

Inspectors found 40 illegal tenant spaces in a William Street building during an investigation that has taken the better part of three weeks since a freak fire on Jan. 10.

The dwelling areas "have been built out over the last several years without any permits and or Certificates of Occupancy being issued," Assistant Village Manager Christopher Steers wrote in an e-mail.

The fire started a few minutes after midnight on Jan. 10, and was sparked by spontaneous combustion, fire Chief Kevin McFadden said. A contractor remodeling an office loft left polyurethane-soaked rags in the open overnight; when fumes from the rag built up in the closed space, the rags and dust from a commercial sander caught fire.

If a sprinkler system hadn't kicked in, and if a handful of employees working in a ground-floor recording studio hadn't seen the smoke, the fire could have been disastrous, McFadden said at the time.

The confusion after the fire was captured on a webcast, which was left streaming as the owners of Zedalza Entertainment .

Port Chester's problems with illegal housing, fire hazards and overcrowding have been . But while past code investigations typically wrapped up within a day or two of major fires, the investigation at 200 William St. has taken the better part of three weeks as inspectors documented a staggering number of violations.

In all, inspectors "confirmed 466 code violations," Steers wrote. The Notice of Violation extended to 59 pages and was too large to attach to an e-mail Steers sent out this weekend.

Among the violations: electrical hazards, egress violations, "fire systems violations" and an overtaxed sprinkler system. The sprinkler system was "compromised due to the unlawful build-outs," Steers wrote.

The owner has not responded to inquiries from village employees. The owner also ignored requests for mandatory fire safety inspections last year; the village issued a notice of violation in April of 2011 after inspectors unsuccessfully tried to schedule a walk-through with the owner in January and sent a follow-up notice.

The building is owned by a realty company registered in Kansas City, MO, according to documents.

Village employees have devoted more than 200 man-hours to the investigation and fire, not counting the initial response by firefighters on Jan. 10.

Follow Port Chester Patch!

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/PortChesterPatch

Twitter: http://twitter.com/PChesterPatch

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Here's all the information anyone would need to choose the most prepared, competent andRead More knowledgeable candidate. Watch the debate for yourself: http://vimeo.com/65783040
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 03:59 pm
Aidan ... your words are eloquent and true.
JJ May 9, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Wow, that's a lot of information. Thanks for sharing it.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) May 24, 2013 at 04:55 pm
Hi, Thank you both for the feedback. Aiden, were you trying to post as a board message? There mightRead More have been some kind of technical glitch that our IT team is working out. In regards to your other comments, I urge you to give it a little time to get used to. The little bell at the top right of the page has a red circle with a number in it to tell you that someone has commented or interacted with something you have done so you should be able to go there and see exactly what is going on in the places where you posted. I hope this helps!
Ian May 24, 2013 at 03:48 pm
I agree with Aidan. I would check the Patch once a day for the articles, but several times to seeRead More how a discussion progressed. With the new format, that method is virtually impossible.
Aidan May 23, 2013 at 05:15 pm
Btw, I tried for twenty minutes to post this as a new thread ... I finally gave up because pageRead More after page did zero ... just spun me nowhere. A waste.
HomeGrown10573 May 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Linda T., I would guess Mrs. Brakewood lives in Port Chester if she is running for the Port ChesterRead More Board of Ed. Even if the schools had to impose an austerity budget, your taxes would still go up. The state has more control in these matters than you think.
Aidan May 15, 2013 at 07:09 pm
Linda, the per pupil expenditure in PC schools is the lowest in Westchester and Rockland countiesRead More ... by about $2,000 per student. The issue is two fold. First, our property values are not as strong as our neighbors, so our homes have a higher levy in order to fund the schools. Second, and more important, is that the reliance on property taxes slams moderate income communities like PC. We need for the state to move to an income tax to fund schools. Scream at your legislators ... not the BoE.
Linda Turturino May 15, 2013 at 11:25 am
I am concerned there is not enough attention to detail in the BOE budget overall and Mrs. BrakewoodRead More comment about keeping taxes affordable ... where does she live ? they are out of control and in my opinion the money we pay for taxes we should have the best looking schools anywhere ... just my opinion