.
Feedback

Astorino: Compromise on Day Care Funding Possible, But $4M Shortfall Looms

County executive calls on county legislators to "realistically address" deficit that threatens program.

Westchester County Executive Robert P. Astorino says he is open to compromise on the level of parent contributions for subsidized day care funding, but contends county legislators must first realistically address the nearly $4 million shortfall that threatens to shut down portions of the program before the end of 2012.

Westchester County is being sued by Democrat members of the Board of Legislators over the amount of money parents must contribute for subsidized day care. In the 2012 budget, the legislators set the parental share at 20 percent of income over the poverty level, regardless of how many children the family has in the program. Throughout the budget process, Astorino said the 20 percent level was too low to keep the program solvent.

Astorino's his veto was overridden by legislators.

"I’m open to suggestions but they must honestly and specifically detail just where the money will come from to keep the day care program operating,” said Astorino.  “The parents and the children in the program, as well as taxpayers, deserve to know where they stand. So do the beneficiaries of the other programs that will have to be raided to finance the gap. I am willing to make tough decisions. I am not willing to pretend we can just find fictional revenues. That’s how Westchester became the highest taxed county in the nation.”

In a blog posting on Patch, Legislator  said the Republican members of the Westchester County Board of Legislators are calling on both sides of the pending litigation between four Democrat County Legislators and the Westchester County Executive and Social Service Commissioner, along with the New York State Commissioner for Office of Children and Families, as defendants, to immediately begin meeting to work out a compromise. 

Maisano said Board of Legislators Chairman Ken Jenkins has been asked to schedule a Committee of the Whole Meeting and to invite the County Executive and Social Services Commissioner to conduct a discussion on ways to  settle the litigation.

Faced with a financial crisis, Westchester Department of Social Services Commissioner Kevin McGuire received approval from the state Office of Children and Family Services to have the parental share raised to 35 percent, the level paid by families in New York City and 20 other counties.

Westchester County families had been paying 33 percent as recently as 2006. 

Despite the state’s permission, Democrats went to court to block the increase. The case is before Acting Supreme Court Judge Robert Neary, who is expected to rule later this month.

Astorino said the $32.5 million the county has set aside for day care subsidies will start to run out this summer. Expenses are expected to hit $36.4 million by the end of the year, producing a $3.9 million deficit.

The program is broken into three categories:

- Temporary Assistance, about 620 children whose family income is low enough that the county is mandated to pay the full amount;

- Low Income, about 2,700 children whose family income can run up to 200 percent of the poverty level;

- Title XX, about 200 children, whose families qualify for a special county program where income can be up to 275 percent of the poverty level.

Most of the Low Income program and all of Title XX program are discretionary, which means the programs are stopped when the funding runs out. Astorino said DSS projections show the Title XX program running out of money at the end of July and Low Income starting to run out of money in October.

Astorino said the situation has been made worse because the overall DSS budget, from which the day care program is funded, has been hit by an $18 million reduction in federal aid and a $5 million increase in Medicaid expenses in 2012.

"When people say just find the money somewhere else in the budget that means we have to take it away from something else," said McGuire. "There are no good choices here. Arguing over whether the parental share should be 20 percent or 35 percent misses the point that when the subsidy runs out, parents are going to be paying 100 percent. When a program runs out of money, it just doesn't appear somewhere else."

The chart below, according to Astorino, illustrates the $32.5 million child day care subsidy program in Westchester County:

Child Care Subsidy categories (DSS)

Public Assistance

Low-Income

Title XX

Eligibility

Earn less than FPL*

Earn 100% to 200% FPL

Earn 200% to 275% FPL

Federally mandated?

Mandated

Partially Mandated

Not Mandated

# of kids in program

620

2,747

206

Who pays?

75% feds/25% county

100% feds until allocation runs out then 100% county

100% county

Parent share

NONE

20% - based on income above FPL

20% - based on income above FPL

County budget FY ’12 – not including $1.9 million cost for administration

$7.6 million

$22 million

$953,000

Funding  situation

Mandatory

Exceeds budget in October

Exceeds budget end of July

* FPL – Federal Poverty Level (for Westchester family of three – $18,530, family of four – $22,350)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
HomeGrown10573 May 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Linda T., I would guess Mrs. Brakewood lives in Port Chester if she is running for the Port ChesterRead More Board of Ed. Even if the schools had to impose an austerity budget, your taxes would still go up. The state has more control in these matters than you think.
Aidan May 15, 2013 at 07:09 pm
Linda, the per pupil expenditure in PC schools is the lowest in Westchester and Rockland countiesRead More ... by about $2,000 per student. The issue is two fold. First, our property values are not as strong as our neighbors, so our homes have a higher levy in order to fund the schools. Second, and more important, is that the reliance on property taxes slams moderate income communities like PC. We need for the state to move to an income tax to fund schools. Scream at your legislators ... not the BoE.
Linda Turturino May 15, 2013 at 11:25 am
I am concerned there is not enough attention to detail in the BOE budget overall and Mrs. BrakewoodRead More comment about keeping taxes affordable ... where does she live ? they are out of control and in my opinion the money we pay for taxes we should have the best looking schools anywhere ... just my opinion
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Here's all the information anyone would need to choose the most prepared, competent andRead More knowledgeable candidate. Watch the debate for yourself: http://vimeo.com/65783040
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 03:59 pm
Aidan ... your words are eloquent and true.
JJ May 9, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Wow, that's a lot of information. Thanks for sharing it.
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Hey Willie....Tom Corbia is a retired PC teacher and his wife is a current employee of the schoolRead More district. Got a problem with that?
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:39 pm
Concerned View, I am sure if elected Jimmy and the other rocket scientist Tommy will put their headsRead More together and solve all our financial woes. Likely they will figure out how to have an iPad for each student, join the code enforcement guys on overcrowding raids, tie Starwoods negotiating team in knots, and solve global warming. Hey, when most of the retired teachers I know are driving around in Fords, Tommy is cruising around town in a brand new Mercedes Benz, so as a self proclaimed fiscal conservative he must be great at crunching those numbers and stretching a buck!
Concerned View May 9, 2013 at 10:42 am
Suspecting that in the next few years, the school board will be forced to resolve the gap betweenRead More expenses and revenues.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:08 am
Concerned View, both the village and the schools have rising expenditures. Costs go up every year -Read More is this a surprise!? The village has the ability to cover up its rise in expenditures by jacking up fees for things like parking, permits, and the like. Didn't I just read an article about new parking meter fees and hours village wide? The school district have no choice but to present and explain its rise in expenditures. The taxpayer has to be smart enough to understand that the rise is unavoidable and reasonable given economic circumstances.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:00 am
Concerned View, you need to sit down with Mr. Carriere and get on the same page on this issue. YouRead More seem to want the district to buoy the fund balance (or go over a cliff!) while Mr. Carriere wants the district to drain it and give it back to the taxpayers. You are confusing readers by being on such opposite pages on this big issue. It certainly makes me glad that neither of you are in charge of the school budget.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 03:56 am
MM11, one reasonable explanation might be that there are two teachers in many classrooms. InRead More inclusion classes (mainstreamed special ed classes) there could easily be two or MORE teachers in the classroom, bringing down the student-teacher ratio while the actual number of students in the class remains the same.
Bea Conetta April 26, 2013 at 09:47 pm
In my opinion, Carolee Brakewood is an absolute "must" for the BOT. She is sincere andRead More dedicated to our village and to the education of our children. She deserves a 2nd term.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 03:08 pm
John, thank you for recognizing my power! : )
John March 29, 2013 at 01:15 am
Get over yourself, Craig Noor. You're one of the people responsible for the mess this country isRead More in.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 01:01 am
Mr. Vecchione, it is President Obama, not "the resident", whether or not you like him heRead More was elected legitimately as president twice, despite all the efforts of Republicans to block that with positively un-American restrictions on the ability of people (primarily people of color, students, the military, and seniors) to vote. Please respect the office of the presidency. Thank you.