.
Feedback

Quotations from Chairman Yahweh

With two Catholics, a Morman and a Congregationalist at the top of the tickets, surely someone will be listening tro God.

As the presidential campaign begins in earnest, is it a peculiar coincidence or a bit of playful providence? Most of the scriptures slated for reading in churches this Sunday sound unabashedly political.

Selected aphorisms from Proverbs sound like planks in a major party platform:

“Do not rob the poor because they are poor, or crush the afflicted at the gate; for the LORD pleads their cause and despoils of life those who despoil them.” (Proverbs 22:22-23) 

Psalm 146 warns voters to be wary of politicians who promise more than they can deliver, or who ignore God’s political manifesto of justice and equality:

“Do not put your trust in princes, in mortals, in whom there is no help. When their breath departs, they return to the earth; on that very day their plans perish. Happy are those whose help is the God of Jacob, whose hope is in the LORD their God, who made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that is in them; who keeps faith forever; who executes justice for the oppressed; who gives food to the hungry. The LORD sets the prisoners free; the LORD opens the eyes of the blind. The LORD lifts up those who are bowed down; the LORD loves the righteous. The LORD watches over the strangers; he upholds the orphan and the widow, but the way of the wicked he brings to ruin.” (Psalms 146:3-9)



The Epistle writer James indignantly dismantles the trickle down theory of economics:

“If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace; keep warm and eat your fill,’ and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.” (James 2:15-17)


And in Mark’s Gospel, a woman of low estate refuses to be ignored by Jesus and stands tall enough to puncture the testosterone ceiling that has reduced her and other women to the status of a slave.

“Jesus said to her, ‘Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children's food and throw it to the dogs.’ But she answered him, “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children's crumbs.” (Mark 7:27-28)

In these few words, scripture reveals God’s position on class impartiality, economic justice, immigration reform, and equal opportunity for women.

I’ll leave it to the reader to decide which of the current candidates for office come closest to embracing God’s platform.

But these verses selected by the Revised Common Lectionary for the 15th Sunday after Pentecost (that’s September 9) make God’s politics hard to ignore.

God loves the poor.

God hates injustice.

God blesses the rich only insofar as they love justice and share their bounty with the poor.

God watches over prisoners, immigrants, orphans and widows, and expects all of us to do the same.

And God has declared that women and men are equal, and their common faith gives women and men the same access to the special blessings of Jesus.


Jesus associated himself with the same platform when he addressed his congregation in Nazareth:

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.” (Luke 4:18-19)

Jesus’ reference to “the acceptable year” puts him – and us – in particularly radical territory because it refers to the Levitical law which requires the faithful to return all purchased property, free all slaves, and forgive all debts that have been accumulating in the past 50 years.

But returning property and forgiving debts is far too sweeping a stimulus package for today’s politicians, most of whom rationalize it away as impractical, economically untenable, or Jesus must have been kidding.

But of course Jesus isn’t kidding. God’s partiality for the poor is a common threat running through scripture that is nearly 3,500 years old.

God loves the poor.

God hates injustice.

God blesses the rich only insofar as they love justice and share their bounty with the poor.

God watches over prisoners, immigrants, orphans and widows, and expects all of us to do the same.

And God has declared that women and men are equal.


As candidates for high executive and legislative office and thousands of their supporters sit in churches all over the country, they will be reminded of these same scriptures.

I wonder how they will react to these quotations from Chairman Yahweh. And I wonder if they will get any fresh insights into God’s political program that will affect their platforms.

Throughout the past several years, most politicians – including President Obama and Governor Romney – have positioned themselves as champions of the great middle class. Mr. Obama says he will improve the lives of the middle class by lowering their taxes, providing better access to education and health care, and paying for it by increasing taxes on the rich. Mr. Romney calls for easing the tax burdens on the rich to encourage them to create more jobs, and for reducing the federal deficit by cutting billions of dollars out of federal programs.

Neither Mr. Obama nor Mr. Romney have offered many details about what they will do to help the very poor, the millions of Americans and other world citizens who live so far below the poverty line that it threatens their very lives.

Meanwhile, the U.S. House and Senate continue to debate how much money should be cut from federal programs in order to reduce the national debt.

Neither political party is talking seriously about slashing waste from the defense budget and representatives of both parties strenuously oppose closing military installations in their districts. This is always puzzling because one would think there would be more flexibility in the defense budget. An order to stop building only one F35 fighter jet would free up $113 million dollars, which would feed a lot of hungry children.

But if Congress moves ahead with the cuts it is proposing, there will be a lot more hungry children in the world.

In an effort to lower the national debt, which some economists say is hurting the economy, many in Congress want to cut or eliminate programs that provide direct support for poor people at home and abroad. These badly needed programs include food Assistance; SNAP (formerly food stamps); free and reduced-price school meals; low-Income Child Care and Early Education; Head Start; Low-Income Health Care; Medicaid; Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP); Tax Credits and Income Support; Refundable tax credits (EITC: the refundable component of the Child Tax Credit); Low-Income Education and Training; Shelter and Homelessness; Preventing Child Maltreatment; Refugee Assistance.

International programs targeted for reduction include International Food Assistance and Emergency Response; P.L. 480 Title II Food for Peace; McGovern-Dole International Food for Education; Global Health; Global Health and Child Survival—State Department (includes PEPFAR); Child Survival and Maternal Health; Sustainable International Development Programs; Development Assistance; International Refugee Assistance and Post-Conflict Support; Peacekeeping; Sustainable International Development Programs; International Poverty-Focused Financial Services (in ways that serve the poorest of the poor).

It’s astonishing, frankly, to listen to the same politicians advocate reducing taxes on rich people while recommending cuts in programs that are helping to keep poor people alive.

Perhaps you saw Sister Simone Campbell address the Democratic Convention last week Sister Simone is an organizer of the “Nuns on the Bus” program that traveled around the country this summer in the name of social justice.

Sister Simone characterized the federal budget as “a moral document.” But the budget proposed by Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, a Roman Catholic layman, is anything but, she said.

“Paul Ryan claims this budget reflects the principles of our shared faith,” Sister Simone said, “but the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops stated that the Ryan budget failed a basic moral test, because it would harm families living in poverty.”

Sister Simone, who also opposes some of Mr. Obama’s programs such as support for marriage equity and freedom of choice, received a standing ovation when she endorsed ObamaCare “as part of my prolife stance and the right thing to do.”

The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops and the Nuns on the Bus are part of an unprecedented coalition of liberal, mainline, evangelical, and Pentecostal groups that oppose federal budget cuts in programs that help the programs. Sister Simone is one of the founding members of the Circle of Protection that came together last year to protect these programs. 

The Circle of Protection members also include the National Association of Evangelicals, the National Council of Churches, Bread for the World, Sojourners, the Alliance to End Hunger, the Salvation Army, the National African American Clergy Network, the National Baptist Convention of America, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, and others. (You can join at www.circleofprotection.us)

“As Christians, we believe the moral measure of the debate is how the most poor and vulnerable people fare,” the organizers said in a statement of purpose. “We look at every budget proposal from the bottom up—how it treats those Jesus called ‘the least of these.’” (Matthew 25:45).


“They do not have powerful lobbies, but they have the most compelling claim on our consciences and common resources,” the organizers said. “The Christian community has an obligation to help them be heard, to join with others to insist that programs that serve the most vulnerable in our nation and around the world are protected. We know from our experience serving hungry and homeless people that these programs meet basic human needs and protect the lives and dignity of the most vulnerable. We believe that God is calling us to pray, fast, give alms, and to speak out for justice.”

Bringing the National Association of Evangelicals into the same cause as the National Council of Churches seems an almost miraculous achievement, but there is a practical reason for it.

The reason is this: both groups believe what scripture says.

And scripture has been proclaiming the same message for thousands of years:

God loves the poor.

God hates injustice.

God blesses the rich only insofar as they love justice and share their bounty with the poor.

God watches over prisoners, immigrants, orphans and widows, and expects all of us to do the same.

And God has declared that women and men are equal.
As the political campaign of 2012 continues, this should be our prayer: that the religious men and women running for office read their scriptures and take them to heart.

And once they have enriched their faith, may they put the admonishment of St. James (2:14-17) into action:

“What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if you say you have faith but do not have works? Can faith save you? If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, and one of you says to them, ‘Go in peace; keep warm and eat your fill,’ and yet you do not supply their bodily needs, what is the good of that? So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.”

Aidan September 9, 2012 at 12:46 pm
"The Epistle writer James indignantly dismantles the trickle down theory of economics ... " ... and that's where I stopped reading. Can't take a moron piece this early in the day.
Mike September 9, 2012 at 01:38 pm
You are subtly, but clearly using this piece to condemn the conservative approach to addressing the current economic crisis. That is fine because it is an opinion. I find it disingenuous, however, because you attempt to criticize this approach via Christian moral teaching. You mislead when you take limited quotes from various sources as if these are actually speaking for all of Christendom. You appear to indicate that the Catholic bishops in total are against Ryans plan when in fact they are not. You also fail to discuss the principles of solidarity and subsidiarity which is really what the budget debate is all about. Your piece appears to condemn Ryan as an immoral person as if he does not care for the poor. This accusation is calumnious. The debate, not a moral absolute, is how best do we as a society do this? The Democrat side will focus on the solidarity approach while Republicans will focus more on the subsidiarity approach. Both are entirely moral. Please at least be honest and forthright in framing the debate rather than impune someone as being immoral. Few would argue with your scripture quotes or our collective call to care for the weakest and most vunerable and I wonder why you failed to mention the Dem platform which supports tax payer financed murder of the most vulnerable in our society- unborn babies?. The argument or difference of opinion is how do we do this and this sir is not a moral issue.
Issy September 9, 2012 at 02:13 pm
Mike, you completely misrepresent the Democrats Platform. It does not support taxpayers funding of abortion.
But maybe you could quote some bible passages that supports the Republican desire to reduce assistance to the poor and increase military expenditure?
Cadeyrn September 9, 2012 at 02:36 pm
Not quite scriptures ... but: “Give a man a fish; you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish; and you have fed him for a lifetime."
What's so uncharitable?
jeff meyer September 9, 2012 at 02:41 pm
Mr. Jenks, an outstanding opinion, indeed. Let the reader embrace it or reject it. However, you have articulated a position on how one's faith can guide them in the arena of political action. Thank you. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe,NY
Cadeyrn September 9, 2012 at 02:49 pm
Geez ... wasn't it Dick Durbin who said no one has a "franchise on religion"?
leesther brown September 9, 2012 at 03:05 pm
The spirit of Brotherhood recognizes of necessity both the need of self help and also the need of helping others in the only way,which ever ultimately does great good,that is,of helping them to help themselves....
Mike September 9, 2012 at 03:11 pm
Issy - did you read the platform statement? I did. I realize that Dems like to take advantage of the work others do. So this is the last time i will do your research but i hope that before you post incorrect or misleading information in the future as a statement of fact rather than your opinion you will do some of your own work first. This is taken DIRECTLY from the DNC platform: "The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v. Wade and a woman’s right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay." http://assets.dstatic.org/dnc-platform/2012-National-Platform.pdf. Notice the last words.
You clearly also do not understand the concepts of Subsdiarity and Solidarity and quite frankly I am not inclined and there is not enough space here to provide a explanation. Further, the point being addressed was the assertion of immoraility upon the Republican approach to our economic situation. To say that Romney or Ryan are against the poor because they have a different approach to solving economic problems is outrageous.
Mike September 9, 2012 at 03:14 pm
Spot on leesther brown! Your comment succintly describes attempting to find balance between subsidiarity and solidarity.
Issy September 9, 2012 at 05:08 pm
Mike, yes I have read the platform and how you project that this means tax-payers financed abortions, is in itself outrageous and worthy of an extreme party hack.
All the platform is saying is that money should not be a barrier to a legal abortion. Many clinics offer discounts to low income women and there is private funding available, non of which is taxpayer funded. The best and proven way to reduce abortion is comprehensive sex education and access to contraceptives, including the morning after pill,
Mike September 9, 2012 at 06:47 pm
Most reasonable people would conclude thst the language employed in the document would mean tax payer support. In fact, if you google this aspect of the platform, you will find that most, if not all articles from various sources conclude this to mean tax payer funded abortions. The main point, though which you nor the original blogger has yet to respond to is the assertion that somehow Ryan and Republicans are immoral in their approach to the economy. Simple question do you agree that Republicans are acting immorally as they attempt solutions to the economy and needs of the poor?
Issy September 9, 2012 at 08:26 pm
Mike, most reasonable people would take the words at face value and not weave sinister meanings to them and as for 'most articles, you are of course referring to right wing articles.
On your second issue could you expand on what specific Republican policies is geared towards the need of poor? crickets......crickets...... I will of course take your undoubted silence on this issue as an indication that they do not have any.
Issy September 9, 2012 at 08:36 pm
While of course no one could disagree with this, teaching someone to fish involves education, infrastructure, health care and of course capital investment.
Not just point at a lake and saying there are fish there, "don't drown" as no one will save you.
Blaue Vogel September 9, 2012 at 11:19 pm
Joe Biden ain't no Catholic.
Blaue Vogel September 9, 2012 at 11:20 pm
And come to think of it, Obama's most likely an atheist.
Mike September 9, 2012 at 11:25 pm
Issy, If you continue to resort to uncivil attacks then my silence does not indicate the lack of merit in my argument, but with my decision to end a conversation with a rude and arrogant person who in the space of a few days has attempted to denigrate me with several names. I realize this is the typical response from those with little to no merit in their arguments. I already provided the answer to your questions and will again point you to better understanding the concepts of solidarity and subsidiarity. I note you still have not answered my very simple question to you....are Republicans immoral beause they chose a different way to solve the problems of our economy and the poor in our country? If you cannot answer without ad hominums, then dont bother.
Issy September 9, 2012 at 11:58 pm
Mike, I apologized for my remarks yesterday, as I do again today, it was as I said, made it jest. I am sorry you can not let it go. However you feel free to mock me?
You have asked if the Republicans are acting immorally in their policies towards the poor and I have simply asked you to state what their polices are, because I am not aware of any specific policies and you seem unable to provide any. So until you do I am unable to answer your question. Take Care.
Mike September 10, 2012 at 12:10 am
Issy, I wish you well.
jeff meyer September 11, 2012 at 06:18 pm
It appears to me that your comments are absurd. Perhaps it would be fitting if you make this the cause for your life chris clement. You could be an army of one. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe,NY
jeff meyer September 11, 2012 at 06:20 pm
Wow, you have a lot to say about the religious beliefs of others. Perhaps you posses some secret revelation? LOL. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe, NY
jeff meyer September 11, 2012 at 06:22 pm
I don't know Aidan. The Epistle of James hold much attempt against the rich. Read it. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe,NY
jeff meyer September 13, 2012 at 05:48 pm
CC, first of all who is "we"? Do you speak for a organization? Do you speak for the PATCH? Is your real name actually chris clement or is that your pen name like so many other opinionated individuals? I believe that I am very positive. Why are you so offended? Because I challenged you on your absurd notion that we should follow the example of China and regulate one's choice as to the amount of children? Do you have children? If you do then thank God for the blessing and stop the stupidity of telling others whether they should or should not have children. BTW, is not sequestration suppose to reduce the national debt? Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe,NY
uj September 16, 2012 at 01:16 pm
HOW COULD A WIFE OF A SITTING JUDGE IN WHITE PLAINS, JUDGE GERALD E LOEHR, BE THE COMMISSIONER OF JURORS , DOWN THE HALL FROM THIS GUY?
WE ARE EXTREMELY APPALLED AND BEING HOODWINKED. WE CITIZENS MUST VOTE JUDGE GERALD E LOEHR OUT OF OFFICE
jeff meyer September 16, 2012 at 01:57 pm
Just what I thought, Clementina. Once you get challenged in regards to your outlandish beliefs you shatter like a cheap piece of glass. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe,NY

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:20 pm
Ginger, Moe and Frankie. I am privilaged to honor you and Gabby with this funraiser. I would alsoRead More like to thank my family who drive 370 miles to help me and show their love for you. So many volunteers that help. Thank you Tina, Ray and Melissa for holding down the tshirt and bookbag table. Thank you to mom and dad for holding down the refreshment table and to Julie, Carley and Jason for working the raffle table. Also to Gabby for the wonderful tattoos and for Missy for teaching our children about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. I would also like to thank Al for bringing the firetruck and all the enjoyment it brought the little ones. Now to all that came and donated, I thank you. Without you all there would be no "WALK". Love you all, Peace and Love, Laurie.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:23 pm
One more person, my husband Rusty, you are my glue that holds me together. Thank you for putting upRead More with me through all my craziness. Love you.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:28 pm
Sorry Pete from Memorable Moments. You know how much you are appreciated for the wonderful picturesRead More that you took the day of the "walk" words cannot describe how I appreciate you donating your time. Thank you.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:04 am
Cathy, Westmed should refer to you as "Valued Customer". No person can serve two masters.Read More Every Doctor must ask themself, "Am I serving my patients or am I serving the insurance companies? Because those two are in direct financial conflict with each other. Seven minute maximum "face time" sort of answers that question, doesn't it? Today, medicine is a business...once you accept that fact you will begin to have the proper mind set to better navigate the system as a customer, not as a patient. There are exceptions.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:06 am
Craig, I may be wrong but I doubt the average doctor at Westmed is making that much money. Do youRead More have a reference for that estimate or just wishful thinking?
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:13 am
Cathy..I agree wholeheartedly. Charging for parking is the epitome of arrogance. As the insuranceRead More companies squeeze Westmed they are trying to pass their overhead onto us, when what they should be doing is dropping the underpaying plans and letting the world know which insurance companies they can no longer accept due to the insurance company's corporate greed. Maybe then the reimbursement will improve. I hope they choke on it.
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 05:31 pm
The new picture is decent ... only about 15 percent Byram.
Silvio V. Buccieri June 14, 2013 at 06:29 pm
IF you like roof tops, then this is picture you should keep posted.
FJT June 17, 2013 at 08:43 am
The photo I was referring to was the one that showed the Byram River not the one that's up thereRead More now. The village's own website has some nice photos of Port Chester. Maybe the Patch could ask to borrow one of those, or take their own photo using the same vantage point.
Craig Noor June 13, 2013 at 05:33 pm
ps oh yeah, it's stand by, not standby
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 07:40 am
Not surprisingly, the Greenwich patch photo is of a dumpster and the rye patch photo is ofRead More people's,owing crack. Or not pathetic!
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:32 am
Keep at it, Katie. It's a small potatoes thing. You'll get it straight, I'm sure. Thanks for theRead More energy.
Sandra Casey June 11, 2013 at 12:37 pm
This photo is still not appropriate. Sorry, but it is more of Byram than of Port Chester. PleaseRead More choose a photo in Port Chester.
Craig Noor June 11, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Yep the left half is Byram ... As I mentioned, if you stood in Byram you could take a picture thatRead More was all Port Chester ...
Bea Conetta June 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
This picture is truly ridiculous, because it is not Port Chester. It is a photo of Byram and aRead More parking lot. As for Patch's new format, I dislike it intensely. Go back to the old format that was more interesting and not so dull. It was good to see the comments of residents and be able to give your own opinion. It wasn't broken, so why change it? I am still waiting to get some help on how to get to my past comments. Can anyone help me with that problem that arose with the new format?
niecey June 10, 2013 at 08:02 am
I agree. It is awful. Go back to old design. I hardly go to the website anymore
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
Please! The "OLD "PATCH WAS SO MUCH EASIER TO NAVIGATE!!!!! I USED TO READ IT EVERYDAY! !!Read More NOW I JUST HATE To OPEN it:(
Aidan June 11, 2013 at 03:54 pm
I visit a lot less nowadays.
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:33 am
This reminds me what " COCA-COLA" DID DECADES AGO! . THEY CAME OUT WITH A DIFFERENT"Read More COKE" NEW! IMPROVED! ETC.ETC. FORMULA. PEOPLE HATED IT THE FIRST DAY IT WENT TO THE SHELVES! LATER ON THEY WENT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL !!! ..... IF IT AINT BROKEN!....
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:53 am
Yeah. It's lousy. Admit it and fix it.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Hi Silvio, Thanks for offering. We have a photo to be used. Just waiting for it to be changed by ourRead More tech team. Thank you.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:18 pm
HI everyone, I do not have the ability to change it myself right now. Patch is aware of the repeatedRead More requests for it to be changed. A new photograph will be put in place as soon as possible. Again, sorry for the delay and for the initial mistake that led to this photo being used. The photo that is supposed to be there is the one used on our facebook page right now.
Lisa Gentes-Hunt (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Feel free to send feedback about the site directly to AOL. Here is the link. Thanks!Read More http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fportchester.patch.com%2Fgroups%2Fopinion%2Fp%2Fplease-go-back-to-the-old-website-design
Craig Noor June 8, 2013 at 07:45 am
I sent my comment on the new pic to that email too and suggest others do too so it can be replacedRead More with a good picture
Linda Turturino June 6, 2013 at 02:08 pm
we as a community need to rally and support the efforts to right all the long past due wrongs thisRead More is a terrible situation and I for one will not rest until it is fixed and I will not take responsibility for wrongs made before my Grand Birth
FJT June 17, 2013 at 09:09 am
Sadly, comments that were posted here by Craig Noor and FJT have been removed -- along with anotherRead More commenter's invitation to share more about the issue at hand. Perhaps our comments were too negative in the eyes of certain people with more power than the average Port Chester property owner.
epp June 19, 2013 at 12:57 am
My neighborhood is riddled with irresponsible renters thanks to the money hungry dirt bag landlords.Read More More burden on the schools and village services and we pay for it every year. My property value went down another $17,000 this past year while taxes keep rising. Eighteen years here and the last seven years have not been very promising.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 10:36 am
I am so sorry about this. We will have it changed as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:26 am
I believe the Port Chester High School is the most beautiful High School in Westchester and all ofRead More the surrounding states. Its architecture is incomparable. It should be representative of the village and its residents. Also you might consider the Veterans Monument on Westchester Ave or Lyons Park with the flowers in bloom. All historical and representative of the beauty of the village. Any one of these sites would make a beautiflul
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:28 am
Patch Picture & represent the village in a magnificent manner.
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:16 pm
And while I'm on the subject of ugly this redesign is still hideous. Nice inscrutable icon next toRead More my post - it adds nothing, but meanwhile you have removed the preview of people's comments that used to come up when you clicked on their name. And this light gray type is awful. And it doesn't make the ads more visible if that is what you were thinking
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:17 pm
Wow, hit a paragraph return and it posts your comment prematurely. Are two-paragraph comments tooRead More much sophistication for your audience, advertisers, or editors?
Anna June 4, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I personally like this image of Main Street...although I would agree it is a sloppy photograph andRead More is not framed well. Why pretend that Port Chester is something that it isn't? It's not Rye. And I don't know why you'd rather have an image of generic sailboats as a backdrop.