.
Feedback

Immigration: Who Will Fix Our Broken Immigration System?

Immigration attorney with over 30 years of experience discusses the proposals for immigration reform

On January 28, 2013, 6 bi-partisan senators presented their proposal for fixing our broken immigration system so that the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the US could have a clear path to US citizenship.

On January 29, 2013, President Obama presented his framework for fixing our immigration system.

Many employers and individuals rely on undocumented workers to fill landscaping jobs, housecleaning positions, home health aide workers, pizza delivery, farmworkers, etc. When these employers find a good worker who is undocumented, many times the employer wants to sponsor the immigrant to
become legal.  As our immigration laws exist today, if an employer wants to sponsor an undocumented immigrant for a “green card” (permanent resident status) the process for a Skilled or Other Worker category will take between 6 to 10 years.  There is an additional 5 year waiting period to apply for US citizenship. 

The proposals both reference creating a clear pathway to US citizenship; which means that the first step in that process is the pathway to permanent resident status, reducing the severe backlogs which exist, strengthening our borders, ensuring that the prospective immigrants have paid all their taxes, cracking down on employers who employ undocumented workers. 

Both proposals state that any new probationary legal status will be required to go to the back of the line of prospective immigrants, and demonstrate a history of work in the United States, and current employment… in order to earn the opportunity to apply for lawful permanent residency. 

“Individuals who are present without lawful status will only receive a green card after every individual who is already waiting in line for a green card, at the time this legislation is enacted, has received their green card. “  This proposal seems to
indicate that those undocumented persons, who start a process for permanent residency before any new plan is put into place, may have their cases completed first.  If this is the case, then all persons should be urged to begin an immigration process as soon as possible, so that their cases are handled first.

Additionally, if prospective immigrants must demonstrate a history of work in the US and current employment, how will this interact with the sanctions against any employers who employ undocumented workers? 

The President’s proposal aims to “eliminate the backlog for employment-sponsored immigration by eliminating annual country caps and adding additional visas to the system. “

The President’s proposal states, “Children brought here illegally through no fault of their own by their parents will be eligible for earned citizenship… by going to college or serving honorably in the Armed Forces.”

The senatorial proposal speaks of “allowing employers to hire immigrants if it can be demonstrated that they were unsuccessful in recruiting an American to fill an open position and the hiring of an immigrant will not displace American workers.” 
This IS our current employer-sponsor system.  The new proposals seem to indicate that the employer-sponsor process may change only in that backlogs will be eliminated, and the undocumented may be able to pay a fine and complete their process inside the US, rather than having to leave the country for their individual interviews abroad at the US Consulate.

Securing the borders appears to be a significant difference between the proposals, since the senatorial proposal wants ALL BORDERS TO BE SECURED prior to implementing any other provisions.  Securing our Borders completely would appear to be an insurmountable burden with no timeline in place.  The President’s
proposal calls for securing our borders, but does not make that a requirement
prior to implementing other proposals.

The President’s proposal does not specifically address the families of the LGBT community, however, in further clarification comments; the President has indicated that he would like to see the same visas available to the LGBT families and communities.

It should be emphasized that these are proposals.  A dialogue has opened between the parties.  Now, Congress must discuss the proposals, a bill must be drafted, presented and voted upon in the Senate, and must be passed by the House of Representatives and signed into law by the President. 

It would seem that anyone with the possibility of being sponsored by an employer should consider starting that process, since backlogs may be eliminated, final interviews may be allowed in the US upon the payment of a fine, and those with pending cases should be handled first.



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Here's all the information anyone would need to choose the most prepared, competent andRead More knowledgeable candidate. Watch the debate for yourself: http://vimeo.com/65783040
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 03:59 pm
Aidan ... your words are eloquent and true.
JJ May 9, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Wow, that's a lot of information. Thanks for sharing it.
Aidan May 23, 2013 at 05:15 pm
Btw, I tried for twenty minutes to post this as a new thread ... I finally gave up because pageRead More after page did zero ... just spun me nowhere. A waste.
Aidan May 23, 2013 at 05:10 pm
If Patch was meant to be both a community news source and a site for community opinions, well, theRead More new format has undermined both of those intentions. The site is unfriendly for even casual perusing and even more user-unfriendly for any sort of dialogue between readers and those who wish to make comments. It might have been a well-intentioned make-over, but it's diminished user traffic and turned folks off. Local issues used to be aired here ... and then debated and commented on by the folks most impacted by those issues. That's all been sabotaged by the new format. Better to admit your error or face the reality of less user traffic and probably less ad revenue as well.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) May 22, 2013 at 10:30 am
Hi, Thank you for your comment. This was an error that we are in the process of correcting. We haveRead More a great photo lined up that I think you'll like. Sorry for the delay and thank you for your patience.
HomeGrown10573 May 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Linda T., I would guess Mrs. Brakewood lives in Port Chester if she is running for the Port ChesterRead More Board of Ed. Even if the schools had to impose an austerity budget, your taxes would still go up. The state has more control in these matters than you think.
Aidan May 15, 2013 at 07:09 pm
Linda, the per pupil expenditure in PC schools is the lowest in Westchester and Rockland countiesRead More ... by about $2,000 per student. The issue is two fold. First, our property values are not as strong as our neighbors, so our homes have a higher levy in order to fund the schools. Second, and more important, is that the reliance on property taxes slams moderate income communities like PC. We need for the state to move to an income tax to fund schools. Scream at your legislators ... not the BoE.
Linda Turturino May 15, 2013 at 11:25 am
I am concerned there is not enough attention to detail in the BOE budget overall and Mrs. BrakewoodRead More comment about keeping taxes affordable ... where does she live ? they are out of control and in my opinion the money we pay for taxes we should have the best looking schools anywhere ... just my opinion