.
Feedback

Immigration: Who Will Fix Our Broken Immigration System?

Immigration attorney with over 30 years of experience discusses the proposals for immigration reform

On January 28, 2013, 6 bi-partisan senators presented their proposal for fixing our broken immigration system so that the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in the US could have a clear path to US citizenship.

On January 29, 2013, President Obama presented his framework for fixing our immigration system.

Many employers and individuals rely on undocumented workers to fill landscaping jobs, housecleaning positions, home health aide workers, pizza delivery, farmworkers, etc. When these employers find a good worker who is undocumented, many times the employer wants to sponsor the immigrant to
become legal.  As our immigration laws exist today, if an employer wants to sponsor an undocumented immigrant for a “green card” (permanent resident status) the process for a Skilled or Other Worker category will take between 6 to 10 years.  There is an additional 5 year waiting period to apply for US citizenship. 

The proposals both reference creating a clear pathway to US citizenship; which means that the first step in that process is the pathway to permanent resident status, reducing the severe backlogs which exist, strengthening our borders, ensuring that the prospective immigrants have paid all their taxes, cracking down on employers who employ undocumented workers. 

Both proposals state that any new probationary legal status will be required to go to the back of the line of prospective immigrants, and demonstrate a history of work in the United States, and current employment… in order to earn the opportunity to apply for lawful permanent residency. 

“Individuals who are present without lawful status will only receive a green card after every individual who is already waiting in line for a green card, at the time this legislation is enacted, has received their green card. “  This proposal seems to
indicate that those undocumented persons, who start a process for permanent residency before any new plan is put into place, may have their cases completed first.  If this is the case, then all persons should be urged to begin an immigration process as soon as possible, so that their cases are handled first.

Additionally, if prospective immigrants must demonstrate a history of work in the US and current employment, how will this interact with the sanctions against any employers who employ undocumented workers? 

The President’s proposal aims to “eliminate the backlog for employment-sponsored immigration by eliminating annual country caps and adding additional visas to the system. “

The President’s proposal states, “Children brought here illegally through no fault of their own by their parents will be eligible for earned citizenship… by going to college or serving honorably in the Armed Forces.”

The senatorial proposal speaks of “allowing employers to hire immigrants if it can be demonstrated that they were unsuccessful in recruiting an American to fill an open position and the hiring of an immigrant will not displace American workers.” 
This IS our current employer-sponsor system.  The new proposals seem to indicate that the employer-sponsor process may change only in that backlogs will be eliminated, and the undocumented may be able to pay a fine and complete their process inside the US, rather than having to leave the country for their individual interviews abroad at the US Consulate.

Securing the borders appears to be a significant difference between the proposals, since the senatorial proposal wants ALL BORDERS TO BE SECURED prior to implementing any other provisions.  Securing our Borders completely would appear to be an insurmountable burden with no timeline in place.  The President’s
proposal calls for securing our borders, but does not make that a requirement
prior to implementing other proposals.

The President’s proposal does not specifically address the families of the LGBT community, however, in further clarification comments; the President has indicated that he would like to see the same visas available to the LGBT families and communities.

It should be emphasized that these are proposals.  A dialogue has opened between the parties.  Now, Congress must discuss the proposals, a bill must be drafted, presented and voted upon in the Senate, and must be passed by the House of Representatives and signed into law by the President. 

It would seem that anyone with the possibility of being sponsored by an employer should consider starting that process, since backlogs may be eliminated, final interviews may be allowed in the US upon the payment of a fine, and those with pending cases should be handled first.



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
HomeGrown10573 May 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Linda T., I would guess Mrs. Brakewood lives in Port Chester if she is running for the Port ChesterRead More Board of Ed. Even if the schools had to impose an austerity budget, your taxes would still go up. The state has more control in these matters than you think.
Aidan May 15, 2013 at 07:09 pm
Linda, the per pupil expenditure in PC schools is the lowest in Westchester and Rockland countiesRead More ... by about $2,000 per student. The issue is two fold. First, our property values are not as strong as our neighbors, so our homes have a higher levy in order to fund the schools. Second, and more important, is that the reliance on property taxes slams moderate income communities like PC. We need for the state to move to an income tax to fund schools. Scream at your legislators ... not the BoE.
Linda Turturino May 15, 2013 at 11:25 am
I am concerned there is not enough attention to detail in the BOE budget overall and Mrs. BrakewoodRead More comment about keeping taxes affordable ... where does she live ? they are out of control and in my opinion the money we pay for taxes we should have the best looking schools anywhere ... just my opinion
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Here's all the information anyone would need to choose the most prepared, competent andRead More knowledgeable candidate. Watch the debate for yourself: http://vimeo.com/65783040
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 03:59 pm
Aidan ... your words are eloquent and true.
JJ May 9, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Wow, that's a lot of information. Thanks for sharing it.
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Hey Willie....Tom Corbia is a retired PC teacher and his wife is a current employee of the schoolRead More district. Got a problem with that?
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:39 pm
Concerned View, I am sure if elected Jimmy and the other rocket scientist Tommy will put their headsRead More together and solve all our financial woes. Likely they will figure out how to have an iPad for each student, join the code enforcement guys on overcrowding raids, tie Starwoods negotiating team in knots, and solve global warming. Hey, when most of the retired teachers I know are driving around in Fords, Tommy is cruising around town in a brand new Mercedes Benz, so as a self proclaimed fiscal conservative he must be great at crunching those numbers and stretching a buck!
Concerned View May 9, 2013 at 10:42 am
Suspecting that in the next few years, the school board will be forced to resolve the gap betweenRead More expenses and revenues.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:08 am
Concerned View, both the village and the schools have rising expenditures. Costs go up every year -Read More is this a surprise!? The village has the ability to cover up its rise in expenditures by jacking up fees for things like parking, permits, and the like. Didn't I just read an article about new parking meter fees and hours village wide? The school district have no choice but to present and explain its rise in expenditures. The taxpayer has to be smart enough to understand that the rise is unavoidable and reasonable given economic circumstances.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:00 am
Concerned View, you need to sit down with Mr. Carriere and get on the same page on this issue. YouRead More seem to want the district to buoy the fund balance (or go over a cliff!) while Mr. Carriere wants the district to drain it and give it back to the taxpayers. You are confusing readers by being on such opposite pages on this big issue. It certainly makes me glad that neither of you are in charge of the school budget.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 03:56 am
MM11, one reasonable explanation might be that there are two teachers in many classrooms. InRead More inclusion classes (mainstreamed special ed classes) there could easily be two or MORE teachers in the classroom, bringing down the student-teacher ratio while the actual number of students in the class remains the same.
Bea Conetta April 26, 2013 at 09:47 pm
In my opinion, Carolee Brakewood is an absolute "must" for the BOT. She is sincere andRead More dedicated to our village and to the education of our children. She deserves a 2nd term.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 03:08 pm
John, thank you for recognizing my power! : )
John March 29, 2013 at 01:15 am
Get over yourself, Craig Noor. You're one of the people responsible for the mess this country isRead More in.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 01:01 am
Mr. Vecchione, it is President Obama, not "the resident", whether or not you like him heRead More was elected legitimately as president twice, despite all the efforts of Republicans to block that with positively un-American restrictions on the ability of people (primarily people of color, students, the military, and seniors) to vote. Please respect the office of the presidency. Thank you.