.
Feedback

Immigration: How can I meet the "hardship" criteria for the new Family Unity Waiver?

An immigration attorney with 30 years of experience provides some guidance on the new Family Unity Waiver



The final rule for the Family Unity Hardship Waiver was published on January 3, 2013 and can be filed starting March 4, 2013. 

Many of my clients have asked me how do they know if they qualify for the “hardship”?

First, it appears that the hardship must be to a US citizen parent or spouse only.   This does not necessarily mean that the US citizen sponsored the Applicant, only that to qualify for the Family Unity Waiver, the Applicant must be the spouse or child of a US citizen relative.

The hardship must be to the US citizen spouse or parent only.  If the Applicant has 3 US citizen children and one of the children is very sick, this hardship does not appear to qualify because the hardship is not to a US citizen spouse or parent, but rather, to a US citizen child.

What is the definition of “hardship” in the context of the Family Unity Waiver?  A hardship may be a negative, such as a serious illness; or it may be a positive, such as a serious career.

For instance:  1) US citizen Mary marries Harold, from Ecuador, and Harold needs to qualify for the Family Unity Waiver in order to return to Ecuador for his personal
interview at the US Consulate in Guayaquil, and return to the US immediately
thereafter, without having to remain in Ecuador for a period of 10 years, as
required by our current immigration laws. 

Mary suffers from worsening diabetes and it has been increasingly difficult to care for their 3 US citizen children.  It would be a severe and unusual hardship for
Mary to move to Ecuador for 10 years with Harold because she would not be able
to continue to see her doctor and receive the treatment that her doctor
provides in the US for her diabetes.  She might not be able to obtain the insulin that she needs in Ecuador, she would not have access to hospitalization in Ecuador.  However, if she remains in the US alone, she would not be able to care
for her children without Harold; she can no longer walk around the supermarket
to do the shopping because she cannot stand on her feet for long periods of
time and she cannot lift the groceries, or the children, or make the house
repairs, etc.  Her diabetes may be enough to meet the standard of “hardship” required for the Family Unity Waiver.

                     2)  What if Mary has no medical issues at all, but one of their US citizen children has severe diabetes.  A hardship case may be able to be made for Mary who must care for the child, inject the insulin into the child, take the child to
medical appointments, hospitalizations, etc.  Although the sickness is not Mary’s sickness, a case may still be able to be made showing how the sickness becomes a severe hardship to Mary, the US citizen spouse who must care for the child.

3)  What if Mary has no medical issues, but she has been a nurse for 15 years.  She went to college for nursing; she worked her way up through her career and is now at the top of her career.  If she were to move to Ecuador, she would lose the entire career for which she studied, and worked so hard, for so many years.  To
force Mary to move to Ecuador and lose her career would be a severe hardship to
Mary. If Mary were to remain in the US while Harold stays in Ecuador for 10
years, this could also be a severe hardship to Mary’s career because she would
also have to care for 3 children all by herself, in addition to her career
which requires her to work some night and weekend shifts.

                  4) Mary is not a US citizen.  She is a lawful permanent resident, or “green card” holder.  However, Harold’s mother is a US citizen, elderly, and suffering from a number of medical issues.  The hardship could be to Harold’s mother, whom Harold supports and helps take care of her household repairs, drives her to her grocery shopping, shovels the snow in front of her house, etc. 

I have made “hardship” arguments in cases in which the US
citizen is currently in college and has not even completed educational studies
to start a career.  Mary could still be studying nursing courses, and we can still show a severe hardship to Mary to have to leave her studies and abandon her career opportunities in the US. 

Each “hardship” case is unique and distinct.  I listen to the background of each family situation.  I have the families meet with a local psychologist who writes up a detailed report for me.  Today, almost every family faces its own set
of hardships.   Creating a winning Family Unity Hardship Waiver means finding the particular hardships which each family faces, obtaining the documentation to support the hardships and explaining the hardships in detail so that they are easily understood and believed.



 



 



 



 



 



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:20 pm
Ginger, Moe and Frankie. I am privilaged to honor you and Gabby with this funraiser. I would alsoRead More like to thank my family who drive 370 miles to help me and show their love for you. So many volunteers that help. Thank you Tina, Ray and Melissa for holding down the tshirt and bookbag table. Thank you to mom and dad for holding down the refreshment table and to Julie, Carley and Jason for working the raffle table. Also to Gabby for the wonderful tattoos and for Missy for teaching our children about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. I would also like to thank Al for bringing the firetruck and all the enjoyment it brought the little ones. Now to all that came and donated, I thank you. Without you all there would be no "WALK". Love you all, Peace and Love, Laurie.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:23 pm
One more person, my husband Rusty, you are my glue that holds me together. Thank you for putting upRead More with me through all my craziness. Love you.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:28 pm
Sorry Pete from Memorable Moments. You know how much you are appreciated for the wonderful picturesRead More that you took the day of the "walk" words cannot describe how I appreciate you donating your time. Thank you.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:04 am
Cathy, Westmed should refer to you as "Valued Customer". No person can serve two masters.Read More Every Doctor must ask themself, "Am I serving my patients or am I serving the insurance companies? Because those two are in direct financial conflict with each other. Seven minute maximum "face time" sort of answers that question, doesn't it? Today, medicine is a business...once you accept that fact you will begin to have the proper mind set to better navigate the system as a customer, not as a patient. There are exceptions.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:06 am
Craig, I may be wrong but I doubt the average doctor at Westmed is making that much money. Do youRead More have a reference for that estimate or just wishful thinking?
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:13 am
Cathy..I agree wholeheartedly. Charging for parking is the epitome of arrogance. As the insuranceRead More companies squeeze Westmed they are trying to pass their overhead onto us, when what they should be doing is dropping the underpaying plans and letting the world know which insurance companies they can no longer accept due to the insurance company's corporate greed. Maybe then the reimbursement will improve. I hope they choke on it.
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 05:31 pm
The new picture is decent ... only about 15 percent Byram.
Silvio V. Buccieri June 14, 2013 at 06:29 pm
IF you like roof tops, then this is picture you should keep posted.
FJT June 17, 2013 at 08:43 am
The photo I was referring to was the one that showed the Byram River not the one that's up thereRead More now. The village's own website has some nice photos of Port Chester. Maybe the Patch could ask to borrow one of those, or take their own photo using the same vantage point.
Craig Noor June 13, 2013 at 05:33 pm
ps oh yeah, it's stand by, not standby
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 07:40 am
Not surprisingly, the Greenwich patch photo is of a dumpster and the rye patch photo is ofRead More people's,owing crack. Or not pathetic!
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:32 am
Keep at it, Katie. It's a small potatoes thing. You'll get it straight, I'm sure. Thanks for theRead More energy.
Sandra Casey June 11, 2013 at 12:37 pm
This photo is still not appropriate. Sorry, but it is more of Byram than of Port Chester. PleaseRead More choose a photo in Port Chester.
Craig Noor June 11, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Yep the left half is Byram ... As I mentioned, if you stood in Byram you could take a picture thatRead More was all Port Chester ...
Bea Conetta June 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
This picture is truly ridiculous, because it is not Port Chester. It is a photo of Byram and aRead More parking lot. As for Patch's new format, I dislike it intensely. Go back to the old format that was more interesting and not so dull. It was good to see the comments of residents and be able to give your own opinion. It wasn't broken, so why change it? I am still waiting to get some help on how to get to my past comments. Can anyone help me with that problem that arose with the new format?
niecey June 10, 2013 at 08:02 am
I agree. It is awful. Go back to old design. I hardly go to the website anymore
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
Please! The "OLD "PATCH WAS SO MUCH EASIER TO NAVIGATE!!!!! I USED TO READ IT EVERYDAY! !!Read More NOW I JUST HATE To OPEN it:(
Aidan June 11, 2013 at 03:54 pm
I visit a lot less nowadays.
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:33 am
This reminds me what " COCA-COLA" DID DECADES AGO! . THEY CAME OUT WITH A DIFFERENT"Read More COKE" NEW! IMPROVED! ETC.ETC. FORMULA. PEOPLE HATED IT THE FIRST DAY IT WENT TO THE SHELVES! LATER ON THEY WENT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL !!! ..... IF IT AINT BROKEN!....
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:53 am
Yeah. It's lousy. Admit it and fix it.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Hi Silvio, Thanks for offering. We have a photo to be used. Just waiting for it to be changed by ourRead More tech team. Thank you.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:18 pm
HI everyone, I do not have the ability to change it myself right now. Patch is aware of the repeatedRead More requests for it to be changed. A new photograph will be put in place as soon as possible. Again, sorry for the delay and for the initial mistake that led to this photo being used. The photo that is supposed to be there is the one used on our facebook page right now.
Lisa Gentes-Hunt (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Feel free to send feedback about the site directly to AOL. Here is the link. Thanks!Read More http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fportchester.patch.com%2Fgroups%2Fopinion%2Fp%2Fplease-go-back-to-the-old-website-design
Craig Noor June 8, 2013 at 07:45 am
I sent my comment on the new pic to that email too and suggest others do too so it can be replacedRead More with a good picture
Linda Turturino June 6, 2013 at 02:08 pm
we as a community need to rally and support the efforts to right all the long past due wrongs thisRead More is a terrible situation and I for one will not rest until it is fixed and I will not take responsibility for wrongs made before my Grand Birth
FJT June 17, 2013 at 09:09 am
Sadly, comments that were posted here by Craig Noor and FJT have been removed -- along with anotherRead More commenter's invitation to share more about the issue at hand. Perhaps our comments were too negative in the eyes of certain people with more power than the average Port Chester property owner.
epp June 19, 2013 at 12:57 am
My neighborhood is riddled with irresponsible renters thanks to the money hungry dirt bag landlords.Read More More burden on the schools and village services and we pay for it every year. My property value went down another $17,000 this past year while taxes keep rising. Eighteen years here and the last seven years have not been very promising.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 10:36 am
I am so sorry about this. We will have it changed as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:26 am
I believe the Port Chester High School is the most beautiful High School in Westchester and all ofRead More the surrounding states. Its architecture is incomparable. It should be representative of the village and its residents. Also you might consider the Veterans Monument on Westchester Ave or Lyons Park with the flowers in bloom. All historical and representative of the beauty of the village. Any one of these sites would make a beautiflul
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:28 am
Patch Picture & represent the village in a magnificent manner.
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:16 pm
And while I'm on the subject of ugly this redesign is still hideous. Nice inscrutable icon next toRead More my post - it adds nothing, but meanwhile you have removed the preview of people's comments that used to come up when you clicked on their name. And this light gray type is awful. And it doesn't make the ads more visible if that is what you were thinking
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:17 pm
Wow, hit a paragraph return and it posts your comment prematurely. Are two-paragraph comments tooRead More much sophistication for your audience, advertisers, or editors?
Anna June 4, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I personally like this image of Main Street...although I would agree it is a sloppy photograph andRead More is not framed well. Why pretend that Port Chester is something that it isn't? It's not Rye. And I don't know why you'd rather have an image of generic sailboats as a backdrop.