.
Feedback

Immigration: How can I meet the "hardship" criteria for the new Family Unity Waiver?

An immigration attorney with 30 years of experience provides some guidance on the new Family Unity Waiver



The final rule for the Family Unity Hardship Waiver was published on January 3, 2013 and can be filed starting March 4, 2013. 

Many of my clients have asked me how do they know if they qualify for the “hardship”?

First, it appears that the hardship must be to a US citizen parent or spouse only.   This does not necessarily mean that the US citizen sponsored the Applicant, only that to qualify for the Family Unity Waiver, the Applicant must be the spouse or child of a US citizen relative.

The hardship must be to the US citizen spouse or parent only.  If the Applicant has 3 US citizen children and one of the children is very sick, this hardship does not appear to qualify because the hardship is not to a US citizen spouse or parent, but rather, to a US citizen child.

What is the definition of “hardship” in the context of the Family Unity Waiver?  A hardship may be a negative, such as a serious illness; or it may be a positive, such as a serious career.

For instance:  1) US citizen Mary marries Harold, from Ecuador, and Harold needs to qualify for the Family Unity Waiver in order to return to Ecuador for his personal
interview at the US Consulate in Guayaquil, and return to the US immediately
thereafter, without having to remain in Ecuador for a period of 10 years, as
required by our current immigration laws. 

Mary suffers from worsening diabetes and it has been increasingly difficult to care for their 3 US citizen children.  It would be a severe and unusual hardship for
Mary to move to Ecuador for 10 years with Harold because she would not be able
to continue to see her doctor and receive the treatment that her doctor
provides in the US for her diabetes.  She might not be able to obtain the insulin that she needs in Ecuador, she would not have access to hospitalization in Ecuador.  However, if she remains in the US alone, she would not be able to care
for her children without Harold; she can no longer walk around the supermarket
to do the shopping because she cannot stand on her feet for long periods of
time and she cannot lift the groceries, or the children, or make the house
repairs, etc.  Her diabetes may be enough to meet the standard of “hardship” required for the Family Unity Waiver.

                     2)  What if Mary has no medical issues at all, but one of their US citizen children has severe diabetes.  A hardship case may be able to be made for Mary who must care for the child, inject the insulin into the child, take the child to
medical appointments, hospitalizations, etc.  Although the sickness is not Mary’s sickness, a case may still be able to be made showing how the sickness becomes a severe hardship to Mary, the US citizen spouse who must care for the child.

3)  What if Mary has no medical issues, but she has been a nurse for 15 years.  She went to college for nursing; she worked her way up through her career and is now at the top of her career.  If she were to move to Ecuador, she would lose the entire career for which she studied, and worked so hard, for so many years.  To
force Mary to move to Ecuador and lose her career would be a severe hardship to
Mary. If Mary were to remain in the US while Harold stays in Ecuador for 10
years, this could also be a severe hardship to Mary’s career because she would
also have to care for 3 children all by herself, in addition to her career
which requires her to work some night and weekend shifts.

                  4) Mary is not a US citizen.  She is a lawful permanent resident, or “green card” holder.  However, Harold’s mother is a US citizen, elderly, and suffering from a number of medical issues.  The hardship could be to Harold’s mother, whom Harold supports and helps take care of her household repairs, drives her to her grocery shopping, shovels the snow in front of her house, etc. 

I have made “hardship” arguments in cases in which the US
citizen is currently in college and has not even completed educational studies
to start a career.  Mary could still be studying nursing courses, and we can still show a severe hardship to Mary to have to leave her studies and abandon her career opportunities in the US. 

Each “hardship” case is unique and distinct.  I listen to the background of each family situation.  I have the families meet with a local psychologist who writes up a detailed report for me.  Today, almost every family faces its own set
of hardships.   Creating a winning Family Unity Hardship Waiver means finding the particular hardships which each family faces, obtaining the documentation to support the hardships and explaining the hardships in detail so that they are easily understood and believed.



 



 



 



 



 



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
HomeGrown10573 May 15, 2013 at 10:26 pm
Linda T., I would guess Mrs. Brakewood lives in Port Chester if she is running for the Port ChesterRead More Board of Ed. Even if the schools had to impose an austerity budget, your taxes would still go up. The state has more control in these matters than you think.
Aidan May 15, 2013 at 07:09 pm
Linda, the per pupil expenditure in PC schools is the lowest in Westchester and Rockland countiesRead More ... by about $2,000 per student. The issue is two fold. First, our property values are not as strong as our neighbors, so our homes have a higher levy in order to fund the schools. Second, and more important, is that the reliance on property taxes slams moderate income communities like PC. We need for the state to move to an income tax to fund schools. Scream at your legislators ... not the BoE.
Linda Turturino May 15, 2013 at 11:25 am
I am concerned there is not enough attention to detail in the BOE budget overall and Mrs. BrakewoodRead More comment about keeping taxes affordable ... where does she live ? they are out of control and in my opinion the money we pay for taxes we should have the best looking schools anywhere ... just my opinion
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 05:50 pm
Here's all the information anyone would need to choose the most prepared, competent andRead More knowledgeable candidate. Watch the debate for yourself: http://vimeo.com/65783040
PC Lover May 9, 2013 at 03:59 pm
Aidan ... your words are eloquent and true.
JJ May 9, 2013 at 03:50 pm
Wow, that's a lot of information. Thanks for sharing it.
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:41 pm
Hey Willie....Tom Corbia is a retired PC teacher and his wife is a current employee of the schoolRead More district. Got a problem with that?
PC Lover May 11, 2013 at 02:39 pm
Concerned View, I am sure if elected Jimmy and the other rocket scientist Tommy will put their headsRead More together and solve all our financial woes. Likely they will figure out how to have an iPad for each student, join the code enforcement guys on overcrowding raids, tie Starwoods negotiating team in knots, and solve global warming. Hey, when most of the retired teachers I know are driving around in Fords, Tommy is cruising around town in a brand new Mercedes Benz, so as a self proclaimed fiscal conservative he must be great at crunching those numbers and stretching a buck!
Concerned View May 9, 2013 at 10:42 am
Suspecting that in the next few years, the school board will be forced to resolve the gap betweenRead More expenses and revenues.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:08 am
Concerned View, both the village and the schools have rising expenditures. Costs go up every year -Read More is this a surprise!? The village has the ability to cover up its rise in expenditures by jacking up fees for things like parking, permits, and the like. Didn't I just read an article about new parking meter fees and hours village wide? The school district have no choice but to present and explain its rise in expenditures. The taxpayer has to be smart enough to understand that the rise is unavoidable and reasonable given economic circumstances.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 04:00 am
Concerned View, you need to sit down with Mr. Carriere and get on the same page on this issue. YouRead More seem to want the district to buoy the fund balance (or go over a cliff!) while Mr. Carriere wants the district to drain it and give it back to the taxpayers. You are confusing readers by being on such opposite pages on this big issue. It certainly makes me glad that neither of you are in charge of the school budget.
Real Deal May 9, 2013 at 03:56 am
MM11, one reasonable explanation might be that there are two teachers in many classrooms. InRead More inclusion classes (mainstreamed special ed classes) there could easily be two or MORE teachers in the classroom, bringing down the student-teacher ratio while the actual number of students in the class remains the same.
Bea Conetta April 26, 2013 at 09:47 pm
In my opinion, Carolee Brakewood is an absolute "must" for the BOT. She is sincere andRead More dedicated to our village and to the education of our children. She deserves a 2nd term.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 03:08 pm
John, thank you for recognizing my power! : )
John March 29, 2013 at 01:15 am
Get over yourself, Craig Noor. You're one of the people responsible for the mess this country isRead More in.
Craig Noor March 29, 2013 at 01:01 am
Mr. Vecchione, it is President Obama, not "the resident", whether or not you like him heRead More was elected legitimately as president twice, despite all the efforts of Republicans to block that with positively un-American restrictions on the ability of people (primarily people of color, students, the military, and seniors) to vote. Please respect the office of the presidency. Thank you.