.
Feedback

Immigration: Family Unity Waiver Hardship Story

A Connecticut and New York immigration attorney with over 30 years of experience provides insights into the old Hardship Waiver process compared to the new Family Unity Waiver


On January 3, 2013 the US Citizenship and Immigration Services published the final rule for the new Family Unity Waiver. 

Undocumented persons who entered the US without any visa at all (by crossing the border from Mexico into the US, for example) are not eligible to have their personal interviews for their “green cards” inside the U.S., even if they marry a US citizen.  They are required to return to the US Consulate in their home country, for their personal interview and to hand in their Waiver packets in person at the US Consulate.  Because of another clause in our Immigration laws, they are barred from returning to the US for a period of 3 to 10 years, as a punishment for having been in the US unlawfully.  The Waiver that they would hand in at the US Consulate abroad was to allow them re-entry to the US, without having to wait outside for up to 10 years.  This harsh provision has caused severe hardship to US families. 

The following is inspired by true stories under the old Immigration Waiver process.  Names and places have been changed. 

A US citizen-wife, Mary, married Edgar from Ecuador.  Neither Mary nor Edgar had ever been married before. Edgar had one 6 year old US citizen son, Harry, who was mentally challenged. When Mary and Edgar married, Harry came to live with them.  Mary and Edgar had 3 more children together.

Mary suffered from worsening diabetes complications, as a result of her pregnancies, including loss of her eyesight. Mary relied on Edgar more and more to handle the shopping and cooking for the family, and the household repairs.  He played with the children on weekends when he wasn’t working, and their family was very happy together.

But Edgar was not in legal status.

Edgar did not enter the US legally with a visa. Edgar had crossed the border on foot from Mexico into Arizona many years ago.  Mary didn’t know about any of this when she fell in love with Edgar.  They met, dated, and fell in love, and as time passed, Edgar shared his story with her. Mary wanted to sponsor Edgar as her husband. They didn’t have a lot of money and decided to fill out the papers for
Immigration on their own and file them with the US Citizenship and
Naturalization Service. The first set of papers was approved in the US. but they learned that Edgar had to travel back to the US Consulate in Ecuador for his personal interview for his permanent resident status, or “green card”. 

Because he did not enter the US with a visa, Edgar was not eligible to have his personal interview for his green card inside the US. Mary and Edgar followed the rules of Immigration, and Edgar traveled down to our US Consulate in Ecuador for his consular processing interview.

When Mary finally contacted me, Edgar had been waiting for over 2 years in Ecuador.

Mary had to quit her job because she couldn't afford child care anymore, she had to sell their house because she couldn’t afford the mortgage or upkeep without her job, she lost her medical insurance which was covered by her job, she could no longer drive due to her failing eyesight, and she and the children moved in with her parents.

Mary continued to care for Edgar's mentally challenged son, Harry, who desperately missed his father and didn't understand why his father had abandoned him.

My office drafted a Waiver application for Edgar, sent the Wavier packet to him and explained the process for filing the Waiver application at the US Consulate.  Edgar went to file the Waiver at the US Consulate, which was very far from his home town in Ecuador.

The U.S. doesn’t send all US citizens down to our consulates to work. Our US Consulates hire foreign nationals to work in some positions at our consulates overseas.  These foreign nationals are local Ecuadorians. When Edgar went to file his Waiver packet, he was told by a foreign national who was employed at our US Consulate that he would never be returning to the US. The foreign national was not authorized to say that to Edgar, did not review his Waiver packet and had no ability to make any decisions regarding Waiver packets or any other US immigration matters.

In fact, Edgar had an excellent Waiver packet based on severe and exceptionally unusual hardship to his US citizen-wife, Mary, who was suffering greatly back in the US.

But Edgar believed the foreign national who took his Waiver packet for filing because Edgar thought this was a person of authority. 

Edgar went into a deep despair, left the US Consulate, and committed suicide.

This story is an example of the old process under which families were separated for extended periods of time, while they waited for their Waivers to be processed overseas. Many families received conflicting information from one US Consulate to
another.  The US Consulate in Moscow might decide a Waiver application packet very differently than a US Consulate in Lima, Peru or Kingston, Jamaica.

This new process finally allows us to file the Waivers inside the US, and obtain approvals, before the immigrant ever leaves the US.  Although each Waiver has a different set of facts, there can now be universal standards that can be applied to each decision.  The Waiver will be pre-approved inside the US.

This means that when the immigrant leaves the US for the consular processing interview, he could be returning in just a few short weeks!

Next week:  Criteria for getting a new Family Unity Waiver approved. 



Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:20 pm
Ginger, Moe and Frankie. I am privilaged to honor you and Gabby with this funraiser. I would alsoRead More like to thank my family who drive 370 miles to help me and show their love for you. So many volunteers that help. Thank you Tina, Ray and Melissa for holding down the tshirt and bookbag table. Thank you to mom and dad for holding down the refreshment table and to Julie, Carley and Jason for working the raffle table. Also to Gabby for the wonderful tattoos and for Missy for teaching our children about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. I would also like to thank Al for bringing the firetruck and all the enjoyment it brought the little ones. Now to all that came and donated, I thank you. Without you all there would be no "WALK". Love you all, Peace and Love, Laurie.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:23 pm
One more person, my husband Rusty, you are my glue that holds me together. Thank you for putting upRead More with me through all my craziness. Love you.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:28 pm
Sorry Pete from Memorable Moments. You know how much you are appreciated for the wonderful picturesRead More that you took the day of the "walk" words cannot describe how I appreciate you donating your time. Thank you.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:04 am
Cathy, Westmed should refer to you as "Valued Customer". No person can serve two masters.Read More Every Doctor must ask themself, "Am I serving my patients or am I serving the insurance companies? Because those two are in direct financial conflict with each other. Seven minute maximum "face time" sort of answers that question, doesn't it? Today, medicine is a business...once you accept that fact you will begin to have the proper mind set to better navigate the system as a customer, not as a patient. There are exceptions.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:06 am
Craig, I may be wrong but I doubt the average doctor at Westmed is making that much money. Do youRead More have a reference for that estimate or just wishful thinking?
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:13 am
Cathy..I agree wholeheartedly. Charging for parking is the epitome of arrogance. As the insuranceRead More companies squeeze Westmed they are trying to pass their overhead onto us, when what they should be doing is dropping the underpaying plans and letting the world know which insurance companies they can no longer accept due to the insurance company's corporate greed. Maybe then the reimbursement will improve. I hope they choke on it.
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 05:31 pm
The new picture is decent ... only about 15 percent Byram.
Silvio V. Buccieri June 14, 2013 at 06:29 pm
IF you like roof tops, then this is picture you should keep posted.
FJT June 17, 2013 at 08:43 am
The photo I was referring to was the one that showed the Byram River not the one that's up thereRead More now. The village's own website has some nice photos of Port Chester. Maybe the Patch could ask to borrow one of those, or take their own photo using the same vantage point.
Craig Noor June 13, 2013 at 05:33 pm
ps oh yeah, it's stand by, not standby
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 07:40 am
Not surprisingly, the Greenwich patch photo is of a dumpster and the rye patch photo is ofRead More people's,owing crack. Or not pathetic!
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:32 am
Keep at it, Katie. It's a small potatoes thing. You'll get it straight, I'm sure. Thanks for theRead More energy.
Sandra Casey June 11, 2013 at 12:37 pm
This photo is still not appropriate. Sorry, but it is more of Byram than of Port Chester. PleaseRead More choose a photo in Port Chester.
Craig Noor June 11, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Yep the left half is Byram ... As I mentioned, if you stood in Byram you could take a picture thatRead More was all Port Chester ...
Bea Conetta June 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
This picture is truly ridiculous, because it is not Port Chester. It is a photo of Byram and aRead More parking lot. As for Patch's new format, I dislike it intensely. Go back to the old format that was more interesting and not so dull. It was good to see the comments of residents and be able to give your own opinion. It wasn't broken, so why change it? I am still waiting to get some help on how to get to my past comments. Can anyone help me with that problem that arose with the new format?
niecey June 10, 2013 at 08:02 am
I agree. It is awful. Go back to old design. I hardly go to the website anymore
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
Please! The "OLD "PATCH WAS SO MUCH EASIER TO NAVIGATE!!!!! I USED TO READ IT EVERYDAY! !!Read More NOW I JUST HATE To OPEN it:(
Aidan June 11, 2013 at 03:54 pm
I visit a lot less nowadays.
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:33 am
This reminds me what " COCA-COLA" DID DECADES AGO! . THEY CAME OUT WITH A DIFFERENT"Read More COKE" NEW! IMPROVED! ETC.ETC. FORMULA. PEOPLE HATED IT THE FIRST DAY IT WENT TO THE SHELVES! LATER ON THEY WENT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL !!! ..... IF IT AINT BROKEN!....
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:53 am
Yeah. It's lousy. Admit it and fix it.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Hi Silvio, Thanks for offering. We have a photo to be used. Just waiting for it to be changed by ourRead More tech team. Thank you.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:18 pm
HI everyone, I do not have the ability to change it myself right now. Patch is aware of the repeatedRead More requests for it to be changed. A new photograph will be put in place as soon as possible. Again, sorry for the delay and for the initial mistake that led to this photo being used. The photo that is supposed to be there is the one used on our facebook page right now.
Lisa Gentes-Hunt (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Feel free to send feedback about the site directly to AOL. Here is the link. Thanks!Read More http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fportchester.patch.com%2Fgroups%2Fopinion%2Fp%2Fplease-go-back-to-the-old-website-design
Craig Noor June 8, 2013 at 07:45 am
I sent my comment on the new pic to that email too and suggest others do too so it can be replacedRead More with a good picture
Linda Turturino June 6, 2013 at 02:08 pm
we as a community need to rally and support the efforts to right all the long past due wrongs thisRead More is a terrible situation and I for one will not rest until it is fixed and I will not take responsibility for wrongs made before my Grand Birth
FJT June 17, 2013 at 09:09 am
Sadly, comments that were posted here by Craig Noor and FJT have been removed -- along with anotherRead More commenter's invitation to share more about the issue at hand. Perhaps our comments were too negative in the eyes of certain people with more power than the average Port Chester property owner.
epp June 19, 2013 at 12:57 am
My neighborhood is riddled with irresponsible renters thanks to the money hungry dirt bag landlords.Read More More burden on the schools and village services and we pay for it every year. My property value went down another $17,000 this past year while taxes keep rising. Eighteen years here and the last seven years have not been very promising.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 10:36 am
I am so sorry about this. We will have it changed as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:26 am
I believe the Port Chester High School is the most beautiful High School in Westchester and all ofRead More the surrounding states. Its architecture is incomparable. It should be representative of the village and its residents. Also you might consider the Veterans Monument on Westchester Ave or Lyons Park with the flowers in bloom. All historical and representative of the beauty of the village. Any one of these sites would make a beautiflul
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:28 am
Patch Picture & represent the village in a magnificent manner.
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:16 pm
And while I'm on the subject of ugly this redesign is still hideous. Nice inscrutable icon next toRead More my post - it adds nothing, but meanwhile you have removed the preview of people's comments that used to come up when you clicked on their name. And this light gray type is awful. And it doesn't make the ads more visible if that is what you were thinking
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:17 pm
Wow, hit a paragraph return and it posts your comment prematurely. Are two-paragraph comments tooRead More much sophistication for your audience, advertisers, or editors?
Anna June 4, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I personally like this image of Main Street...although I would agree it is a sloppy photograph andRead More is not framed well. Why pretend that Port Chester is something that it isn't? It's not Rye. And I don't know why you'd rather have an image of generic sailboats as a backdrop.