.
Feedback

Feds Target Bank of America in $1B Home Loan Mess

Civil suit contends mortgage loans sold to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac were defective and rushed throughout without proper scrutiny.

The federal government today launched a lawsuit targeting Bank of America, claiming the huge bank generated thousands of defective home mortgage loans that were sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, leading to more than $1 billion in losses and "countless" foreclosures.

The lawsuit charges that Bank of America continued a new loan program called "Hustle" that was designed to process loans at high speed without quality checks. The government contends this practice was started by Countrywide mortgage, which was acquired by Bank of America in 2008.

“For the sixth time in less than 18 months, this office has been compelled to sue a major U.S. bank for reckless mortgage practices in the lead-up to the financial crisis," said Preet Bharara, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York. "The fraudulent conduct alleged in today’s complaint was spectacularly brazen in scope. As alleged, through a program aptly named ‘the Hustle,’ Countrywide and Bank of America made disastrously bad loans and stuck taxpayers with the bill."

Bharara said Countrywide and Bank of America systematically removed every check in favor of its own balance – they cast aside underwriters, eliminated quality controls, incentivized unqualified personnel to cut corners, and concealed the resulting defects.

"These toxic products were then sold to the government sponsored enterprises as good loans," Bharaa said. "This lawsuit should send another clear message that reckless lending practices will not be tolerated.” 

Countrywide, on its own and as part of Bank of America, was the largest provider of home mortgage loans to the government-sponsored Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The government charges that in 2007, as loan default rates were increasing across the nation, Countrywide removed checks that were designed to ensure mortgages were being properly issues. 

To do this, the government contends Countrywide used unqualified and inexperienced clerks and did away with compliance specialists who were supposed to ensure loans had met all the necessary conditions for closing. The lawsuit charges that Countrywide and then later Bank of America knowlingly originated loans with escalating levels of fraud and other series defects that were sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

In September 2008, as a result of massive losses from, among other things, the payment of guarantees to investors on loans that defaulted, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed in conservatorship under the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. Simultaneously with the creation of the conservatorships, the United States Treasury exercised its authority to purchase Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac stock. As of Dec. 31, 2011, the Treasury had provided $183 billion in funding to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through stock purchases.

Bank of America received $15 billion in federal funds through the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) on Oct. 28, 2008; an additional $10 billion on Jan. 9, 2009; and $20 billion on Jan. 16, 2009. Bank of America repaid taxpayers’ combined $45 billion TARP investment in full on Dec. 9, 2009. 

The lawsuit seeks civil penalties and damages for more than $1 billion in losses suffered by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for defaulted loans fraudulently sold by Countrywide and Bank of America.

joshua tanner October 24, 2012 at 07:49 pm
The gov is blaming the people they forced to issue loans. Clinton et al used the Community Reinvestment Act to intimidate banks into making risky loans. The banks didn't mind because the gov let them believe that they had the banks backs. Thats the problem with GSEs (Gov Sponsored Enterprises) and public/private initiatives. The gov removes the risk and the businesses get sloppy. Only a fool would make loans to people who were bad risks and that's what the gov made happen. The mortgage market was essentially made into a socialst experiement where the gov was pushing businesses to provide housing in spite of sound principles. The gov blaming the banks now is dishonest but what's new these days?
bruiser October 24, 2012 at 08:52 pm
Josh The financial crisis that shook the economy in 2008 was caused by failures of 30 years of deregulation and a banking industry eager to trade in toxic subprime mortgages but blind to the dangers of the toxic loans.(GREED WAS THE CAUSE).
Ned Merrill October 25, 2012 at 12:01 am
Here comes the rain baby. You think you got wet in 08? You ain't seen nothing yet.
SPK October 25, 2012 at 02:41 am
Bruiser, you couldn't be more wrong
Greed explains nothing Canada had none of these problems...inthe US, crisis was caused and incented by the Feds and social engineering
joshua tanner October 25, 2012 at 03:00 am
It was Bill Clinton and his treasury secretary Robert Rubin who pushed to have Glass–Steagall Act repealed. It was also Clinton who was responsible for Community Reinvestment Act. That act allowed banks to be denied ability to grow and make mergers if a local community board determined a bank wasn't giving out more loans to minorities (which ended up including illegals) - even if they were bad credit risks. The local review boards ended up being groups like ACORN and their lawyers like Barack Obama (who was suing banks with ACORN back in Illinois during the 90s). No bank was going to give out loans to people who didn't even have down-payments. It was the winks and nod from government that gave them the security to give away the store. Bush didn't help when he also pushed his "Home Ownership Society" (he also favored illegals). However the GOP did try to make reforms around 2003 but Barney Frank laughed at the notion there were any problems (which he called "exaggerated")
bruiser October 25, 2012 at 03:18 am
Steve we all have our views, and as a business man my mind has been made up a long time ago.I still maintain it was the Wall Street banks who got greedy. Credit rating agencies acted as enablers and Congress and federal regulators looked the other way.Greed explains a lot steve,remember Bernie Madoff,just remember greed is what drove him and he is only one in a long list of greedy people,there are still people like Madoff out there but just haven't been caught yet.
bruiser October 25, 2012 at 03:31 am
Josh i will not get into a long discussion,right away you go back to clinton(Remember the blame bush syndrome) and how it aggrivates people,well the same goes true for clinton.I have a novel idea,lets all stop blaming each other and work together and fix this mess,republicans and democrats alike.I don't want to hear Romney is the man,i don't want to hear Obama is the man,there are 535 people who run this country and i would like it if they all did the job they are paid to do and fix what politicians caused in the first place.
Bob Zahm October 25, 2012 at 04:14 am
Unless Countrywide committed fraud by knowingly misrepresenting what it was selling, I hope the gov't gets its clock cleaned on this law suit. (Of course, we the tax payers will pay either way). But this attempt to re-write history is absurd.
joshua tanner October 25, 2012 at 06:21 am
"Josh i will not get into a long discussion,right away you go back to clinton.."
Well it was you who wrote "2008 was caused by failures of 30 years of deregulation" The MAJOR deregulation was caused by Clinton. That's a fact and not an opinion. You can't have things both ways
jeff meyer October 25, 2012 at 07:34 am
If you don't believe that greed played a part in the housing meltdown then you are naive at best. Yes, the CRA was aimed at helping lower income residents to receive mortgages. That being said, in no way, shape or form was it intended to push mortgages to UNQUALIFIED applicants. Banks don't get intimidated, they get greedy. Both the GOP and the DEMS were complicit. GOP constituents (finance,banks) made out from the fees ascertained from said mortgages. DEM constituents (lower income) made out since many who were previously deemed "unqualified" could hence receive mortgages. You banking apologist crack me up. I guess you would have me believe that the "poor" banks were intimidated by the big bad government. Or out of the goodness of their benevolent hearts they packaged mortgages to those not qualified and PROFIT had NOTHING to do with it. Please drink a cup of reality before you reply. LOL. Jeff Meyer Tuckahoe, NY
Bob Zahm October 25, 2012 at 10:42 am
@Jeff - you are so right that greed played a big part in the "meltdown". What else could have driven the pipeline of no questions asked mortgages? Of course, the fact that the federal gov't has been pushing policies to increase home ownership for the last 70 years and an almost total lack of enforcement of the active laws and regulatory oversight had nothing to do with it.
Chris Marengo October 25, 2012 at 12:39 pm
It's government intimidation at their best. The 1977 Community Reinvestment Act forced the banks to make risky loan, due to alleged "redlining" in poor neighborhoods. clinton doubled down on this 1977 law, using our now governor Andrew Cuomo, as HUD secretary, to extort cash from banks for refusing to make bad loans...under the guise that the banks were racist (i.e, not making loans to minorities due to bad credit, but the govenrment chalked it up to racism). So the government and the big banks have been involved in this unholy partnership, and now the government can claim how the banks have been bad actors while telling the American public that they are fighting for the "little people". It's like the Mafia, except without the cool murders.
Pat Godfrey October 25, 2012 at 01:32 pm
Government has it's scapegoat for the bad public policy it creates. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac executives should be the one that are under indictment. They are the ones that pushed these bad loans and huge bonuses were given them because of the amount of loans that were made. 9 billion dollars of hidden loses were accused by auditors to have been covered up. What did the esecutives of Freddie and Fannie get? Bonuses. Jamie Gorelic for example got 26 million in bonuses during her time there.
Andromachos October 25, 2012 at 02:31 pm
After all is said and done, it appears that the failure was the result of many factors, both in the private sector and in government. All of them should be reined in. Both the major banks and the federal government are too large.
SPK October 25, 2012 at 04:06 pm
Bruiser, respect your view. Consider that greed has been around as long as Cain knocked off Abel. Canada, with same greed for profits as the US, had none of these problems. Why; difference in Government policy. Canada never let a social agenda interfere with sound lending.
In my view, reader Joshua got it right. Regrettably, we learned the wrong lessons from 2008. All Wall Street did was make efficient that which should never have occurred in first place: Lending to people who shud not have gotten home loans. Recall that for the longest time, Wall Street risked partner money and not taxpayer money, and Dodd-Frank was unnecessary. We are always more cautious with our own money.
NorthCountyHound October 25, 2012 at 05:05 pm
People try to lend me money all the time. I have a sound business, assets, a near perfect credit rating etc and I say no. I pay as I go, usually cash. If I can't afford something, I don't buy it. There were many culprits in the system that led to the 2008 collapse. Congress, Fannie/Freddie, the banks and mortgage lenders, wall street, the rating agencies and the SEC but also the deadbeats who took money with no means or intention of repaying it. I bought my house in 1991 for 170k for cash that I saved while working for 15 years. in 07 it was aprraised for 525k. Now it might be worth 400k but I own it outright. My wife bugged me for years to take a second note, or a HELOC and buy a mansion cause so many of her friends had them. Wisely, I said no. I see no reason why anyone needs to live beyond their means on borrowed money. Credit for business growth and inventory and day to day operating capital is a necessary component of a modern economy, but credit offered to deadbeats simply to inflate real estate or move consumer items is ridiculous and results in exactly the situation we have now. People get what they deserve. I have no sympathy for any of these losers. My only complaint is that the the people I mentioned above who rigged the system for this ineveitable fiasco are not doing hard time.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Port Chester Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:20 pm
Ginger, Moe and Frankie. I am privilaged to honor you and Gabby with this funraiser. I would alsoRead More like to thank my family who drive 370 miles to help me and show their love for you. So many volunteers that help. Thank you Tina, Ray and Melissa for holding down the tshirt and bookbag table. Thank you to mom and dad for holding down the refreshment table and to Julie, Carley and Jason for working the raffle table. Also to Gabby for the wonderful tattoos and for Missy for teaching our children about the dangers of drugs and alcohol. I would also like to thank Al for bringing the firetruck and all the enjoyment it brought the little ones. Now to all that came and donated, I thank you. Without you all there would be no "WALK". Love you all, Peace and Love, Laurie.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:23 pm
One more person, my husband Rusty, you are my glue that holds me together. Thank you for putting upRead More with me through all my craziness. Love you.
Laurie MacAllister June 18, 2013 at 09:28 pm
Sorry Pete from Memorable Moments. You know how much you are appreciated for the wonderful picturesRead More that you took the day of the "walk" words cannot describe how I appreciate you donating your time. Thank you.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:04 am
Cathy, Westmed should refer to you as "Valued Customer". No person can serve two masters.Read More Every Doctor must ask themself, "Am I serving my patients or am I serving the insurance companies? Because those two are in direct financial conflict with each other. Seven minute maximum "face time" sort of answers that question, doesn't it? Today, medicine is a business...once you accept that fact you will begin to have the proper mind set to better navigate the system as a customer, not as a patient. There are exceptions.
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:06 am
Craig, I may be wrong but I doubt the average doctor at Westmed is making that much money. Do youRead More have a reference for that estimate or just wishful thinking?
PC Lover June 15, 2013 at 09:13 am
Cathy..I agree wholeheartedly. Charging for parking is the epitome of arrogance. As the insuranceRead More companies squeeze Westmed they are trying to pass their overhead onto us, when what they should be doing is dropping the underpaying plans and letting the world know which insurance companies they can no longer accept due to the insurance company's corporate greed. Maybe then the reimbursement will improve. I hope they choke on it.
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 05:31 pm
The new picture is decent ... only about 15 percent Byram.
Silvio V. Buccieri June 14, 2013 at 06:29 pm
IF you like roof tops, then this is picture you should keep posted.
FJT June 17, 2013 at 08:43 am
The photo I was referring to was the one that showed the Byram River not the one that's up thereRead More now. The village's own website has some nice photos of Port Chester. Maybe the Patch could ask to borrow one of those, or take their own photo using the same vantage point.
Craig Noor June 13, 2013 at 05:33 pm
ps oh yeah, it's stand by, not standby
Craig Noor June 14, 2013 at 07:40 am
Not surprisingly, the Greenwich patch photo is of a dumpster and the rye patch photo is ofRead More people's,owing crack. Or not pathetic!
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:32 am
Keep at it, Katie. It's a small potatoes thing. You'll get it straight, I'm sure. Thanks for theRead More energy.
Sandra Casey June 11, 2013 at 12:37 pm
This photo is still not appropriate. Sorry, but it is more of Byram than of Port Chester. PleaseRead More choose a photo in Port Chester.
Craig Noor June 11, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Yep the left half is Byram ... As I mentioned, if you stood in Byram you could take a picture thatRead More was all Port Chester ...
Bea Conetta June 12, 2013 at 10:07 am
This picture is truly ridiculous, because it is not Port Chester. It is a photo of Byram and aRead More parking lot. As for Patch's new format, I dislike it intensely. Go back to the old format that was more interesting and not so dull. It was good to see the comments of residents and be able to give your own opinion. It wasn't broken, so why change it? I am still waiting to get some help on how to get to my past comments. Can anyone help me with that problem that arose with the new format?
niecey June 10, 2013 at 08:02 am
I agree. It is awful. Go back to old design. I hardly go to the website anymore
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:26 am
Please! The "OLD "PATCH WAS SO MUCH EASIER TO NAVIGATE!!!!! I USED TO READ IT EVERYDAY! !!Read More NOW I JUST HATE To OPEN it:(
Aidan June 11, 2013 at 03:54 pm
I visit a lot less nowadays.
Gus garcia June 11, 2013 at 10:33 am
This reminds me what " COCA-COLA" DID DECADES AGO! . THEY CAME OUT WITH A DIFFERENT"Read More COKE" NEW! IMPROVED! ETC.ETC. FORMULA. PEOPLE HATED IT THE FIRST DAY IT WENT TO THE SHELVES! LATER ON THEY WENT BACK TO THE ORIGINAL !!! ..... IF IT AINT BROKEN!....
Aidan June 14, 2013 at 11:53 am
Yeah. It's lousy. Admit it and fix it.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:30 pm
Hi Silvio, Thanks for offering. We have a photo to be used. Just waiting for it to be changed by ourRead More tech team. Thank you.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:18 pm
HI everyone, I do not have the ability to change it myself right now. Patch is aware of the repeatedRead More requests for it to be changed. A new photograph will be put in place as soon as possible. Again, sorry for the delay and for the initial mistake that led to this photo being used. The photo that is supposed to be there is the one used on our facebook page right now.
Lisa Gentes-Hunt (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 03:36 pm
Feel free to send feedback about the site directly to AOL. Here is the link. Thanks!Read More http://feedback.aol.com/product/patch/?tid=446&r=http%3A%2F%2Fportchester.patch.com%2Fgroups%2Fopinion%2Fp%2Fplease-go-back-to-the-old-website-design
Craig Noor June 8, 2013 at 07:45 am
I sent my comment on the new pic to that email too and suggest others do too so it can be replacedRead More with a good picture
Linda Turturino June 6, 2013 at 02:08 pm
we as a community need to rally and support the efforts to right all the long past due wrongs thisRead More is a terrible situation and I for one will not rest until it is fixed and I will not take responsibility for wrongs made before my Grand Birth
FJT June 17, 2013 at 09:09 am
Sadly, comments that were posted here by Craig Noor and FJT have been removed -- along with anotherRead More commenter's invitation to share more about the issue at hand. Perhaps our comments were too negative in the eyes of certain people with more power than the average Port Chester property owner.
epp June 19, 2013 at 12:57 am
My neighborhood is riddled with irresponsible renters thanks to the money hungry dirt bag landlords.Read More More burden on the schools and village services and we pay for it every year. My property value went down another $17,000 this past year while taxes keep rising. Eighteen years here and the last seven years have not been very promising.
Liz Giegerich (Editor) June 5, 2013 at 10:36 am
I am so sorry about this. We will have it changed as soon as possible. Thank you for your patience.
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:26 am
I believe the Port Chester High School is the most beautiful High School in Westchester and all ofRead More the surrounding states. Its architecture is incomparable. It should be representative of the village and its residents. Also you might consider the Veterans Monument on Westchester Ave or Lyons Park with the flowers in bloom. All historical and representative of the beauty of the village. Any one of these sites would make a beautiflul
Anne Latella June 8, 2013 at 11:28 am
Patch Picture & represent the village in a magnificent manner.
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:16 pm
And while I'm on the subject of ugly this redesign is still hideous. Nice inscrutable icon next toRead More my post - it adds nothing, but meanwhile you have removed the preview of people's comments that used to come up when you clicked on their name. And this light gray type is awful. And it doesn't make the ads more visible if that is what you were thinking
Craig Noor June 4, 2013 at 07:17 pm
Wow, hit a paragraph return and it posts your comment prematurely. Are two-paragraph comments tooRead More much sophistication for your audience, advertisers, or editors?
Anna June 4, 2013 at 09:05 pm
I personally like this image of Main Street...although I would agree it is a sloppy photograph andRead More is not framed well. Why pretend that Port Chester is something that it isn't? It's not Rye. And I don't know why you'd rather have an image of generic sailboats as a backdrop.